On 2024/02/15 14:20, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:42:44PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > Even if you nuke this port, could you try to get a backtrace? SIGILL
> > > might be an IBT issue we need to track down.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:42:44PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Even if you nuke this port, could you try to get a backtrace? SIGILL
> > might be an IBT issue we need to track down.
>
> Core was generated by `QSyncthingTray'.
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Even if you nuke this port, could you try to get a backtrace? SIGILL
> might be an IBT issue we need to track down.
Core was generated by `QSyncthingTray'.
Program terminated with signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
#0
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:29:00PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:07:09AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:50:27PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > > - net/qsyncthingtray: dead
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:07:09AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:50:27PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > - net/qsyncthingtray: dead upstream?
> >
> > Looks very dead to me. Feel free to kill it.
>
>
On 2/4/24 08:25, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All $MAINTAINER CC'd.
- geo/qgis: I can't imagine that such an active project would still use it.
-
On Sun Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
>
> I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
> ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All $MAINTAINER CC'd.
>
> - geo/qgis: I can't imagine that such an active project
On Sun Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> - databases/kexi: On my list, remove the dependency
> - devel/kreport: On my list, remove the dependency
Please find below a simple patch to disable WebKit in kreport and kexi.
OK?
diff --git a/databases/kexi/Makefile
On Mon, February 5, 2024 22:52, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun Feb 04, 2024 at 02:30:16PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>> > - misc/subsurface: dead upstream?
Hi!
No, upstream is quite active but they stopped shipping releases the
On Sun Feb 04, 2024 at 02:30:16PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > - misc/subsurface: dead upstream?
>
> Builds and runs, haven't tested extensively.
Nice, thanks Klemens for investing your time in this port. I would say we
won't
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:50:27PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > - net/qsyncthingtray: dead upstream?
>
> Looks very dead to me. Feel free to kill it.
ATT: NO LONGER ACTIVELY MAINTAINED, NEEDS NEW OWNER || A OS X / Windows /
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> - net/qsyncthingtray: dead upstream?
Looks very dead to me. Feel free to kill it.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
https://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> - misc/subsurface: dead upstream?
Builds and runs, haven't tested extensively.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/misc/subsurface/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -r1.15
On 2024/02/04 08:25, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
>
> I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
> ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All $MAINTAINER CC'd.
>
...
> - misc/subsurface: dead upstream?
not dead.
'Current "Weekly"
On 2024/02/04 08:25, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> - databases/recoll: Needs an update, upstream switched to qt5-webengine
recoll already uses qtwebengine on arch where qtwebengine is available
(amd64, aarch64, i386)
On Sun Feb 04, 2024 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
> >
> > I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
> > ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All
Le Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:25:13AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
>
> I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
> ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All $MAINTAINER CC'd.
>
> - geo/qgis: I can't imagine that such an active
Hi ports@, hi ports hackers,
I would like to get rid of 'x11/qt5/qtwebkit'. Here is a short list with
ports using qtwebkit with some comments. All $MAINTAINER CC'd.
- geo/qgis: I can't imagine that such an active project would still use it.
- x11/py-qt5: Easy to remove
- x11/qt5/docs: Easy to
18 matches
Mail list logo
