On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 02:50:50PM +, Lucas Raab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This was tested with a build of nitter which seems to be working fine. Tests
> pass as well with the exception of the networking test (to be expected).
>
> Other tests?
>
> Thanks,
> Lucas
Other tests or good as is?
diff
Hello,
This was tested with a build of nitter which seems to be working fine. Tests
pass as well with the exception of the networking test (to be expected).
Other tests?
Thanks,
Lucas
diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/nim
commit - 92589e22275c52c30a8171b1f7f1f5a277949e16
commit +
On 2023/04/28 20:20:34 +, Lucas Raab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's an update for nim to 1.6.12. I have not extensively tested this except
> for compiling/running nitter (https://github.com/zedeus/nitter). nitter itself
> has been running fine since at least 1.6.8. The patch with this diff is
>
Hello,
Here's an update for nim to 1.6.12. I have not extensively tested this except
for compiling/running nitter (https://github.com/zedeus/nitter). nitter itself
has been running fine since at least 1.6.8. The patch with this diff is
related to https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/20144.
On 2022/08/22 19:28:00 +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - update nim to 1.6.6
> - add missing test dependencies
> - enable for arm64; some additional tests fail as compared to amd64
> and coroutines aren't supported. but generally works good enough
> to gather more
Hi,
- update nim to 1.6.6
- add missing test dependencies
- enable for arm64; some additional tests fail as compared to amd64
and coroutines aren't supported. but generally works good enough
to gather more test-results from actual users.
OK?
Index: Makefile
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/03/01 12:00, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/1/22 10:56, Omar Polo wrote:
> >
> > > live with the fact that it can't find jester and zip/zipfiles (we
> > > don't have them in the port tree, right?)
> >
> > They are probably part of the project's CI
On 2022/03/01 12:00, Volker Schlecht wrote:
>
>
> On 3/1/22 10:56, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > live with the fact that it can't find jester and zip/zipfiles (we
> > don't have them in the port tree, right?)
>
> They are probably part of the project's CI setup or otherwise popular enough
> for all
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/03/01 00:41, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > + # _pbuild can't open outbound TCP connections
> > + rm -rf ${WRKSRC}/tests/stdlib/tnetconnect.nim
>
> I don't know a lot about nim, but IMHO it's often helpful to keep
> network tests in ports, even if they're
On 2022/03/01 00:41, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> + # _pbuild can't open outbound TCP connections
> + rm -rf ${WRKSRC}/tests/stdlib/tnetconnect.nim
I don't know a lot about nim, but IMHO it's often helpful to keep
network tests in ports, even if they're usually disabled for people
using
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/02/28 12:40, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> >
> > > > Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > > > > It uses fork instead of posix_spawn ... both OpenBSD and FreeBSD
> > > > > remove
> > > > > that line in their ports, though. NetBSD keeps it as it is.
> > > > >
> > > > > It was
On 2022/02/28 12:40, Volker Schlecht wrote:
>
> > > Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > > > It uses fork instead of posix_spawn ... both OpenBSD and FreeBSD remove
> > > > that line in their ports, though. NetBSD keeps it as it is.
> > > >
> > > > It was added by upstream 8 years ago, and the comment
Volker Schlecht wrote:
>
>
> > so here's another try. I'm still keeping ${CFLAGS} in the size case but
> > leaving -Os afterwards; can remove that if deemed extreme.
> >
> > Comments/OK/Thoughts?
>
> Can't give OKs, but looks good to me and I hope someone else OKs it soon ;)
thanks :)
I
On 2022/02/28 10:06, Omar Polo wrote:
> I wasn't trying to say that we should patch the nim compiler to always
> respect $CFLAGS, but rather that it should respect $CFLAGS *during the
> build*. My patch had the side-effect of persisting the build-time
> $CFLAGS as default compiler flags for the
Volker Schlecht wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/22 00:57, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> >> * I'm taking the gamble that the
> >> "slow machines can get a head of themselves and fail to link"
> >> comment is not valid anymore, using MAKE_JOBS for the parallelBuild
> >> parameter.
> >
> > I can't really comment on
Volker Schlecht wrote:
> I think I got all -O3 replaced by -O2 now. It's still mostly hardcoded
> and not picked up from CFLAGS.
>
> That seems to be intentional:
> https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/3050
>
> Also included:
>
> * your fix for i386 CPU detection
> * removed the git call
Omar Polo wrote:
> Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > Updates lang/nim to 1.6.4
> >
> > * Builds tools along with the main compiler
> > -- nimgrep
> > -- nimpretty
> > -- nimsuggest
> >
> > * Drops the install.sh patch (install.sh is not used in do-install)
> >
> > * Drops defunct mirror site
> >
>
Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Updates lang/nim to 1.6.4
>
> * Builds tools along with the main compiler
> -- nimgrep
> -- nimpretty
> -- nimsuggest
>
> * Drops the install.sh patch (install.sh is not used in do-install)
>
> * Drops defunct mirror site
>
> Built and tested (toying with tutorials,
This is my first patch to OpenBSD ports.
This updates lang/nim from 1.2.0 to 1.4.2
Version 1.2.0 on OpenBSD 6.8 fails 'make install' with a symptom similar to
what is described in https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/13645 and fixed in
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/13692
With the
n/nim c koch
> ./koch tools
>
> Sorry I'm not a real porter, but I'm happy to help donate to the
> foundation if
> someone here can help update lang/nim to 1.2.0. Thank you.
>
>
Hi,
I fixed the MAINTAINER syntax.
If the patch is ok could someone commit it, please?
Best regards,
Luca De Pandis
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/nim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.11
Hi,
since I don't think there are people interested in such port beside me,
I will gladly take the maintainership of lang/nim.
I modified the patch in order to reflect the change.
Could someone commit if patch is ok?
Best regards,
Luca De Pandis
Index: Makefile
up
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:31:42PM +0100, Luca De Pandis wrote:
> Hi,
> thank you everyone for the feedback.
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:01:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > 3 days is way too soon to be prodding really, especially for what is
> > a relatively specialist port that
Hi,
thank you everyone for the feedback.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:01:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> 3 days is way too soon to be prodding really, especially for what is
> a relatively specialist port that most ports devs won't use. Anyway a
> few quick comments I am short on time - as
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:07:10PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
[...]
> cvs diff -uNp, please. More information:
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/testing.html
Yes, but note that this is the automatic default and doesn't need to be
specified *unless* you changed /etc/skel/.cvsrc or your
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:02:16PM +, Luca De Pandis wrote:
> Hi,
> could anyone review this, so that the port could be upgraded, please?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Luca De Pandis
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:40:00PM +0100, me wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I updated the lang/nim port to the latest
On 2021/01/15 14:02, Luca De Pandis wrote:
> Hi,
> could anyone review this, so that the port could be upgraded, please?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Luca De Pandis
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:40:00PM +0100, me wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I updated the lang/nim port to the latest version.
> >
> > The
On Fri Jan 15, 2021 at 03:58:57PM +, Dimitri Karamazov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:02:16PM +, Luca De Pandis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > could anyone review this, so that the port could be upgraded, please?
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Luca De Pandis
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at
Hi,
could anyone review this, so that the port could be upgraded, please?
Best regards,
Luca De Pandis
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:40:00PM +0100, me wrote:
> Hi,
> I updated the lang/nim port to the latest version.
>
> The following checks passed:
> - portcheck
> - port-lib-depends-check
> -
Hi,
I updated the lang/nim port to the latest version.
The following checks passed:
- portcheck
- port-lib-depends-check
- update-plist
Best regards,
Luca De Pandis
nim.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
From: Denis Fondras
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:40:15 +
To: openbsd-ports
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] lang/nim-1.2.0
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:07:27AM -0600, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
Denis, the PLIST file does most of this work, just adjust it to add
nimble,
the directory ${SYSCONFDIR}/nim
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:07:27AM -0600, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> Denis, the PLIST file does most of this work, just adjust it to add nimble,
> the directory ${SYSCONFDIR}/nim and modify the cfg entries to add the /nim/
> directory in their path. And lose the manual copies from the Makefile.
>
On 2020/04/13 17:20, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:29:23AM -0600, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > I think there is still an issue with the nimble install (thanks for
> > that by the way, I was thinking of this myself):
> >
> > > do-install:
> > >
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:29:23AM -0600, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> I think there is still an issue with the nimble install (thanks for
> that by the way, I was thinking of this myself):
>
> > do-install:
> > ${INSTALL_PROGRAM_DIR} ${PREFIX}/bin
> > ${INSTALL_PROGRAM}
Hi Denis,
I think there is still an issue with the nimble install (thanks for
that by the way, I was thinking of this myself):
do-install:
${INSTALL_PROGRAM_DIR} ${PREFIX}/bin
${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/bin/nim ${PREFIX}/bin
+ ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/bin/nimble
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Here is a new diff. Add config files to /usr/local/etc/nim and add nimble
> > to the
> > package.
>
> ?!
>
> OpenBSD should use ${SYSCONFDIR}, not /usr/local/etc.
>
package, local, it sounded like a sensible path.
Here is
On 2020/04/12 10:54, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:41:53PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:12:58AM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Latest Update for nim-1.2.0
> > > Builds successfully on amd64
> > >
> > > 1 new patch added ->
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:41:53PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:12:58AM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Latest Update for nim-1.2.0
> > Builds successfully on amd64
> >
> > 1 new patch added -> patch-install_sh
> > 4 patches removed -> patch-koch_nim,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:09:57PM -0600, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> The patch doesn't apply:
>
>
> Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |Index: patches/patch-config_nim_cfg
>
The patch doesn't apply:
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: patches/patch-config_nim_cfg
|===
|RCS file:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:41:53PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:12:58AM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Latest Update for nim-1.2.0
> > Builds successfully on amd64
> >
> > 1 new patch added -> patch-install_sh
> > 4 patches removed -> patch-koch_nim,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:12:58AM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> Latest Update for nim-1.2.0
> Builds successfully on amd64
>
> 1 new patch added -> patch-install_sh
> 4 patches removed -> patch-koch_nim, patch-lib_pure_endians_nim,
> patch-compiler_extccomp_nim,
>
Latest Update for nim-1.2.0
Builds successfully on amd64
1 new patch added -> patch-install_sh
4 patches removed -> patch-koch_nim, patch-lib_pure_endians_nim,
patch-compiler_extccomp_nim,
patch-tests_testament_tester_nim
Someone should test this.
can help update lang/nim to 1.2.0. Thank you.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/nim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 Makefile
--- Makefile31 Aug 2019 15:36:56 - 1.10
+++ Makefile26 Mar 2020 15:13:33 -
@@ -6,43 +6,37 @@
On Thu Apr 18, 2019 at 04:11:24PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:04:15AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Update Nim to 0.19.4. My goal was to build it with clang.
> >
> > Most parts will build with ${CC} especially Nim itself but for some
> > parts
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:04:15AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Update Nim to 0.19.4. My goal was to build it with clang.
>
> Most parts will build with ${CC} especially Nim itself but for some
> parts clang are used.
>
> What do you think? It's good enough to go in? Nim users around?
I sent
Update Nim to 0.19.4. My goal was to build it with clang.
Most parts will build with ${CC} especially Nim itself but for some
parts clang are used.
What do you think? It's good enough to go in? Nim users around?
Tests results on amd64:
FAILURE! total: 105 passed: 85 skipped: 0 failed: 20
Best
Hi ports --
Here's a diff to update lang/nim to its latest release.
An important difference is in how nim interacts with the C compiler.
Previously, we were trying to get nim to use egcc in places, though
looking at the code now I'm not entirely sure we were successful at
this. There's
On 06/07/17 19:59, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:07:20AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi ports --
Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
The Changelog is here:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:07:20AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > Hi ports --
> >
> > Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
> > The Changelog is here:
> >
On 06/07/17 19:07, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi ports --
Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
The Changelog is here:
https://nim-lang.org/blog/2017/05/17/version-0170-released.html
Note that I only tested
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Hi ports --
>
> Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
> The Changelog is here:
> https://nim-lang.org/blog/2017/05/17/version-0170-released.html
>
> Note that I only tested this on amd64 as I don't
On Wed Jun 07, 2017 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Hi ports --
>
> Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
> The Changelog is here:
> https://nim-lang.org/blog/2017/05/17/version-0170-released.html
>
> Note that I only tested this on amd64 as I don't
Hi ports --
Attached is a diff for lang/nim, bringing it to its latest version.
The Changelog is here:
https://nim-lang.org/blog/2017/05/17/version-0170-released.html
Note that I only tested this on amd64 as I don't have access to an i386
machine. Testing there would be appreciated.
Take
On miércoles, 15 de junio de 2016 10:54:24 (CEST) Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2016/06/15 04:17, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:59:12AM +0200, Jakub Skrzypnik wrote:
> > > Can I somehow show my appreciation for that? I'm going to learn
> > > Nim
> > > soon,
On 2016/06/15 04:17, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:59:12AM +0200, Jakub Skrzypnik wrote:
> > Can I somehow show my appreciation for that? I'm going to learn Nim
> > soon, so the newest available version on OpenBSD (which I use on my
> > lap^Wdesktop) would be
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:59:12AM +0200, Jakub Skrzypnik wrote:
> Can I somehow show my appreciation for that? I'm going to learn Nim
> soon, so the newest available version on OpenBSD (which I use on my
> lap^Wdesktop) would be very helpful. ;)
I committed the update just a minutes before of
Can I somehow show my appreciation for that? I'm going to learn Nim
soon, so the newest available version on OpenBSD (which I use on my
lap^Wdesktop) would be very helpful. ;)
Comments? OKs?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/nim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile
--- Makefile22 Dec 2015 19:40:48 - 1.2
+++ Makefile10 Jun 2016 01:06:14 -
@@ -4,9
60 matches
Mail list logo
