hmm, on Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:06:06PM -0500, Ian Darwin said that
I agree. It needs to get committed so we can move ahead, and it's better
than what it replaces.
perhaps waiting a bit won't hurt:
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=13049
-f
--
this message written by sandy. a highly
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:06:06PM -0500, Ian Darwin said that
I agree. It needs to get committed so we can move ahead, and it's better
than what it replaces.
perhaps waiting a bit won't hurt:
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=13049
Our testing
Isn't it time firefox 1.5 got committed already? Why are people holding
back their okays!?
I thought there was more work to do or something. Please commit 1.5
already.
I agree. It needs to get committed so we can move ahead, and it's better
than what it replaces.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Dassow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Here's an updated patch.
Please test! We want to get this in! :)
Works on -current i386.
In general it seems fine except for crashing out with
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Here's an updated patch.
Please test! We want to get this in! :)
Works on -current i386.
Thanks and kind regards
Simon
Bernd,
hi Im an openbsd newbie and i would like to ask you for some
instructions on how to use this diff.
thanks a million
edgar
On 11/30/05, Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:53 am, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 08:17 pm, Jolan Luff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:20:09AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 08:39 am, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Peter Str?mberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 08:17 pm, Jolan Luff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:20:09AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 08:39 am, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Peter Str?mberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll have to add --enable-official-branding to CONFIGURE_ARGS
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:20:09AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 08:39 am, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Peter Str?mberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll have to add --enable-official-branding to CONFIGURE_ARGS
to get the right brand.dtd file.
Yes, with that I get
Peter Strömberg wrote:
On 30 Nov 2005 at 23:59, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
The latest set of patches
Kurt Miller wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't use --enable-official-branding without
permission from moz.org. They have started to enforce their trademarks.
We can use Firefox Community Edition branding in the mean time. See:
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html
Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Here's an updated patch.
Please test! We want to get this in! :)
Bernd
Works OK on i386 -current (some browsing and ftp downloads tested).
I've two plugins NoScript and AdBlock that works as well.
/Sigfred
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Here's an updated patch.
Please test! We want to get this in! :)
Bernd
Tested on amd64 -current.
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:20:09 -0500
Kurt Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On Friday 02 December 2005 08:39 am, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
: Peter Strömberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: We'll have to add --enable-official-branding to CONFIGURE_ARGS
: to get the right brand.dtd file.
:
: Yes,
Peter Strömberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll have to add --enable-official-branding to CONFIGURE_ARGS
to get the right brand.dtd file.
Yes, with that I get Firefox.
For me this 1.5 update is fine on amd64, i386, and sparc64.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL
On 30 Nov 2005 at 23:59, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
This version still prominently calls itself Deer Park
On 30/11/05, Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
Seems to be working well enough on i386. My extensions all seem to be
doing the right things:
*
Hi!
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
Bernd
PS: 'patch -E' recommended
mozilla-firefox-1.5.diff.gz
Description: application/gunzip
Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
This version still prominently calls itself Deer Park (window
title, about, help). Is that a hiccup because ours
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 18:59, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.
This diff was mostly done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please test (esp. on non-i386) and comment.
This version still prominently calls itself Deer
20 matches
Mail list logo
