Still valid for the tl11.diff.5.gz sent by add on october 31.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:50:28PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> [that was the tl11.4.diff.gz one]
>
> I tested it package-wise (several install/update/uninstall sequences,
> with and without other packages depending on texlive insta
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:47:23PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. Here goes with xindy on sparc64 and powerpc. Tested
> build on sparc64, looks good.
>
> Do people think we are about ready to go with this?
>
> Attached
[that was the tl11.4.diff.gz one]
I tested it package-wis
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:40:39AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:47:23PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > Attached
> >
> > Same again with the latest wave of security/reliability fixes.
>
> For what it's
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:40:39AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:47:23PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Attached
>
> Same again with the latest wave of security/reliability fixes.
For what it's worth, this works for me (on amd64) on a couple of
documents I'm working on (ex
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:07:00PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Now clisp works on amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc64.
> Maybe it makes sense to include xindy on powerpc and sparc64 arches?
Great. I will give that a go. New diff coming soon.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:11:50PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 01:40:54PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > You are absolutely right, it rebuilds unnecessarily with whta I
> > suggested (need to read manpages more). sorry for the noise.
>
> Well, here is the latest diff. This
> The LIB_DEPENDS, is the very reason why the make print-package-signature
> doesn't match the pkg_info -S for ports, and why there is a rebuild
> problem, on a number of ports.
>
> See man library-specs(7)
>
> RUN_DEPENDS always creates a @depends line, LIB_DEPENDS doesn't.
>
> clisp is required f
On 09/29/11 17:17, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>>>
>>> Here is the latest diff I am working with.
>>>
>>> I have tried:
>>> * install on amd64
>>> * install on i386
>>> * upgrade from -current/texlive-2010 -> texlive-2011 (on amd64)
>>> * upgrade from -curren
> >> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
> >
> > Here is the latest diff I am working with.
> >
> > I have tried:
> > * install on amd64
> > * install on i386
> > * upgrade from -current/texlive-2010 -> texlive-2011 (on amd64)
> > * upgrade from -current/texlive-2010 -> texlive-2011 (on i38
Thanks a bunch, this should reduce dpb rebuilds a lot.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>> -LIB_DEPENDS += devel/ffcall
>> +RUN_DEPENDS += lang/clisp
>
> Finding if ffcal was actually needed was act
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> -LIB_DEPENDS += devel/ffcall
> +RUN_DEPENDS += lang/clisp
Finding if ffcal was actually needed was actually on my TODO list.
Thanks
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On 09/28/11 15:00, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:47:39PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>
> Here is the latest diff I am working with.
>
> I have tried:
> * install on amd64
> * install on i386
> * upgrade from -current/texlive-20
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:00:21PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:47:39PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>
> Here is the latest diff I am working with.
>
> I have tried:
> * install on amd64
> * install on i386
> * upgra
You don't run make plist for texlive. The plist is scripted. Perhaps the
diff is busted, it works mega clean here.
On Sep 22, 2011 9:04 PM, "Amit Kulkarni" wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>>
>> I say WIP because it is only tested amd64 and the upgrade paths have not
been
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:04:22PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
> >
> > I say WIP because it is only tested amd64 and the upgrade paths have not
> > been
> > tested. I post it because I know there are a brave few who would like to
> > test.
> >
> Hi,
>
> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>
> I say WIP because it is only tested amd64 and the upgrade paths have not been
> tested. I post it because I know there are a brave few who would like to test.
>
> If you would like to help, please reply to the thread with test results and
> bugs.
> The patch didn't apply cleanly. I fixed it manually though.
>
> # find . -name "*.rej"
> ./base/Makefile.rej
> ./texmf/Makefile.rej
>
> Will report on amd64!
>
Ahhh sorry, this was after espie@ infrastrucutre fix.
> Hi,
>
> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>
> I say WIP because it is only tested amd64 and the upgrade paths have not been
> tested. I post it because I know there are a brave few who would like to test.
>
> If you would like to help, please reply to the thread with test results and
> bugs.
Anyone?
On Sep 13, 2011 1:40 PM, "Edd Barrett" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a WIP update of texlive 2011.
>
> I say WIP because it is only tested amd64 and the upgrade paths have not
been
> tested. I post it because I know there are a brave few who would like to
test.
>
> If you would like to help, pl
19 matches
Mail list logo
