Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-06-20 Thread Theo Buehler
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:10:00AM -0700, Nam Nguyen wrote: > Alexander Bluhm writes: > > > ok? > > > > bluhm > > Your diff had mangled whitespace, so a fixed diff is provided here so it > applies cleanly. Can this be put through a bulk? amd64 bulk completed, no fallout

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-06-15 Thread Nam Nguyen
Alexander Bluhm writes: > ok? > > bluhm Your diff had mangled whitespace, so a fixed diff is provided here so it applies cleanly. Can this be put through a bulk? ok namn@ Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-06-11 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:34:54AM -0700, Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Here is a fresh diff with some additions: > > - move to gnome's gitlab to avoid using ftp (as suggested by tj@) > > - CONFIGURE_STYLE autoreconf > > - translate patches from Makefile.in --> Makefile.am This is not correct. The gnome

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-31 Thread Nam Nguyen
Ping. Diff is repasted below. Nam Nguyen writes: > Moritz Buhl writes: > >> Hi ports@, >> >> A new libxml release is out (two actally) >> http://www.xmlsoft.org/news.html >> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/b48e77cf4f6fa0792c5f4b639707a2b0675e461b >> >> This fixes CVE-2021-3541.

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-15 Thread Nam Nguyen
Daniel Dickman writes: > libxml 2.9.12 already includes the change for python 3.9, right? > > So if we go to this new version of libxml, I don't think the local diff > would be needed anymore? Yes. I checked and confirmed that your proposed diff is part of this new release. > > I'll hold off

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-15 Thread Daniel Dickman
On Sat, 15 May 2021, Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Thanks for this. It is similar to something I have in mystuff. This > does not incorporate daniel@'s diff for unbreaking python 3.9 yet. > libxml 2.9.12 already includes the change for python 3.9, right? So if we go to this new version of libxml,

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-15 Thread Nam Nguyen
Moritz Buhl writes: > Hi ports@, > > A new libxml release is out (two actally) > http://www.xmlsoft.org/news.html > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/b48e77cf4f6fa0792c5f4b639707a2b0675e461b > > This fixes CVE-2021-3541. > > I updated the version and removed previous patches for

Re: [update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-14 Thread Moritz Buhl
I forgot to run make update-patches. Sorry for the noise. mbuhl Index: textproc/libxml/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/libxml/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.188 diff -u -p -r1.188 Makefile --- textproc/libxml/Makefile

[update] textproc/libxml

2021-05-14 Thread Moritz Buhl
Hi ports@, A new libxml release is out (two actally) http://www.xmlsoft.org/news.html https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/b48e77cf4f6fa0792c5f4b639707a2b0675e461b This fixes CVE-2021-3541. I updated the version and removed previous patches for CVE-2021-3537 and CVE-2020-7595. make

Re: Security update textproc/libxml addressing CVE-2012-2807

2012-09-04 Thread Sebastian Trahm
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:55:47AM +0200, Sebastian Trahm wrote: Hello, http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-2807 The diff below addresses multiple integer overflows in libxml2 on 64-bit platforms. Any feedback on this or should we consider an update instead? cheers

Security update textproc/libxml addressing CVE-2012-2807

2012-08-09 Thread Sebastian Trahm
Hello, http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-2807 The diff below addresses multiple integer overflows in libxml2 on 64-bit platforms. Build fine on i386 but i can't get my hands on any 64-bit build machine. So please test, comment, commit. The patch has been derived from the

MAINTAINER-UPDATE: textproc/libxml++ (and patch for dependencies)

2008-04-22 Thread Andreas Bihlmaier
Hello ports@, here is an update to textproc/libxml++. Only port which depens on it is games/wormux (patch for LIB_DEPENDS below). Update[s] tested @i386 and @sparc64. Wormux is broken @sparc64, but also with old lib and I think it is not worth the effort to debug (and I'm not maintainter of

Re: UPDATE: textproc/libxml

2006-06-02 Thread steven mestdagh
steven mestdagh [2006-06-01, 22:00:22]: version 2.6.24 has more bugfixes and improvements. make regress is happy on i386, amd64, sparc and sparc64. please test/comment. if you are about to start a bulk build, please put this in. this should create the new patches in the right place. Index:

UPDATE: textproc/libxml

2006-06-01 Thread steven mestdagh
version 2.6.24 has more bugfixes and improvements. make regress is happy on i386, amd64, sparc and sparc64. please test/comment. if you are about to start a bulk build, please put this in. Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: UPDATE: textproc/libxml

2006-03-13 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:45:34 +0100 steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: here is an update for libxml, which includes numerous bugfixes. a bulk build on i386 with this introduced no breakage. please test, including 'make regress'. gcc2 platform reports appreciated. works ok (including