New cvs diff -uNP generated:
1) Updated 0.12.2 -> 0.14.6
2) sed applied to example rc files per @sthen
3) Patched default tint2rc with OpenBSD path and apps
4) Searched tint2conf/main.c tint2conf/properties.c for incorrect
declaration and patched to print_t %lld (long long)
5) New tint2conf no
The list seems to be mis-behaving lately, I did not get your last reply
and my initial response did not ask for posting confirmation.
I think I was generating the cvs diff incorrectly, I used the example in
the OpenBSD anoncvs web page: cvs diff -u > /tmp/my.diff. Should be
cvs diff -uNp >
On Aug 30, 2017: 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2017/08/28 10:23, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
Summary so far:
1) Updated 0.12.2 - 0.14.6
2) Removed example rc files with Linux /usr/share/application path
3) Patched default tint2rc with /usr/local/share/application path.
4) Added pkg/README
On 2017/08/30 12:58, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> I initially Bcc;'s this to spacehopper and then realized that Bcc's are
> probably filtered. Initial response bottom posted \/.
>
> On Aug 30, 2017: 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/08/28 10:23, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> > > Summary so
On 2017/08/28 10:23, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> Summary so far:
>
> 1) Updated 0.12.2 - 0.14.6
> 2) Removed example rc files with Linux /usr/share/application path
> 3) Patched default tint2rc with /usr/local/share/application path.
> 4) Added pkg/README describing how to obtain the example
Summary so far:
1) Updated 0.12.2 - 0.14.6
2) Removed example rc files with Linux /usr/share/application path
3) Patched default tint2rc with /usr/local/share/application path.
4) Added pkg/README describing how to obtain the example *.tint2rc files
5) Searched tint2conf/main.c
IMHO, it would otherwise be a regression not to tweak.
Attached is the 4th revision to update tint2. This patch restores the
post-install sed command that edits Launcher paths in
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc and /usr/local/share/examples/tint2/*.tint2rc:
/usr/share/applicatons ->
On Aug 13, 2017: 13:16, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi Scott --
On 08/10/17 21:03, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
Jggimi reviewed the port and found an extra tab and line in the
Makefile.
Version 3 of the attached diff corrects.
This mostly looks good. There's some whitespace/newline tweaks that I
I am not getting those errors in OpenBox either with a
~/.config/tint2/tint2rc or with a simulated first run that uses
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc. OpenBox requires py-xdg. I also have xdg-utils
installed so I suspect the lack one of these packages may be the issue.
I'm still confused on whether or
Hi Scott --
On 08/10/17 21:03, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
Jggimi reviewed the port and found an extra tab and line in the
Makefile.
Version 3 of the attached diff corrects.
This mostly looks good. There's some whitespace/newline tweaks that I
can fix on commit.
Question though: I get a lot
Jggimi reviewed the port and found an extra tab and line in the
Makefile.
Version 3 of the attached diff corrects.
Thanks
Scott
On Aug 10, 2017: 10:23, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi Scott --
I'll take a look at this later today.
~Brian
On 08/09/17 20:01, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
A revised
Hi Scott --
I'll take a look at this later today.
~Brian
On 08/09/17 20:01, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
A revised diff to update x11/tint2 is attached. Upstream has added 2
new features: 1) Configurable "Buttons" that attach an icon to a
command. 2) Shell script "Executors" with examples for
A revised diff to update x11/tint2 is attached. Upstream has added 2
new features: 1) Configurable "Buttons" that attach an icon to a
command. 2) Shell script "Executors" with examples for Network
monitoring and disk usage.
Changelog here:
https://github.com/o9000/tint2
I cvs add'd/rm;d the
Revised patch attached.
Added update-mime-databases
Patched Main CMakeLists.txt to not install /etc/xdg/tint2/tintrc
Patched themes CMakeLists.txt to install all tint conf files
to /usr/local/share/examples/tint2
@sampled /etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc
On Aug 04, 2017: 15:53, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 8/4/2017 3:50 PM, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> I think I have this ready but I'm having difficulty generating a diff -
> the two new patches are not showing up in the diff.
>
> I installed a snapshot ports.tar.gz and used cvs to update it.
> Then I copied the Makefile, distinfo, PLIST and the
I think I have this ready but I'm having difficulty generating a diff -
the two new patches are not showing up in the diff.
I installed a snapshot ports.tar.gz and used cvs to update it.
Then I copied the Makefile, distinfo, PLIST and the two patches into the
ports tree.
I used the following
On Aug 04, 2017: 00:21, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi Scott --
On 08/03/17 21:07, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
Sorry, my first reply I forget to change the To: entry - it went to
devio.us.
Thanks Brian,
The current 12.2 port did have @sample entries for
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc. I cannot use the old
Hi Scott --
On 08/03/17 21:07, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
Sorry, my first reply I forget to change the To: entry - it went to
devio.us.
Thanks Brian,
The current 12.2 port did have @sample entries for
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc. I cannot use the old entries because the newer
code follows
Sorry, my first reply I forget to change the To: entry - it went to
devio.us.
Thanks Brian,
The current 12.2 port did have @sample entries for
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc. I cannot use the old entries because the newer
code follows Freedesktop specs by generating a default
/etc/xdg/tint2/tint2rc
Hi Scott --
On 08/03/17 16:32, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
I ran 'make update-plist' and the following bogus elements showed up
Scanning destdir
Getting old lists
1st pass identifying files
Attaching annotations
Sorting out destdir files
make-plist: Bogus element outside of every prefix: /etc/xdg
I ran 'make update-plist' and the following bogus elements showed up
Scanning destdir
Getting old lists
1st pass identifying files
Attaching annotations
Sorting out destdir files
make-plist: Bogus element outside of every prefix: /etc/xdg
make-plist: Bogus element outside of every prefix:
***clip***
One thing I noticed looking at your diff is you're removing the @sample lines.
Does tint2 no longer have configuration file? What happens if you run 'make
update-plist' again? Does it complain about bogus elements? If so, you'll have
to put the @sample lines back in, and return the
On 08/03/17 11:52, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
I reviewed the OpenBSD/Faq for anoncvs and think I was able to generate
a consistent patch. From /usr/ports/x11/tint2 I ran
cvs diff -u > /tmp/tint2-0.14.6.diff
On review of the patch, it does not have any content to remove
x11/tint2/patches.
I reviewed the OpenBSD/Faq for anoncvs and think I was able to generate
a consistent patch. From /usr/ports/x11/tint2 I ran
cvs diff -u > /tmp/tint2-0.14.6.diff
On review of the patch, it does not have any content to remove
x11/tint2/patches. Upstream had revised all areas patched in 12.2 and
Hi Scott --
On 08/03/17 00:04, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
The attached diff and tarball update tint2 to the latest stable version.
Using clang4.0, it compiled without patches or errors.
Passed portcheck and tested on amd64 with several example config files.
I don't think your patch is
The attached diff and tarball update tint2 to the latest stable version.
Using clang4.0, it compiled without patches or errors.
Passed portcheck and tested on amd64 with several example config files.
--
J. Scott Heppler
? 0
Index: Makefile
26 matches
Mail list logo
