Hi!
Here's an update to slim-1.3.6.
I've a positive report about the improved rc.d script.
Ciao,
David
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/slim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.24 Makefile
---
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:17:24AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
Hi!
Here's an update to slim-1.3.6.
I've a positive report about the improved rc.d script.
Ciao,
David
works for me on amd64
ok rpe@
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my previous mail)
Index: Makefile
On 2013/10/30 11:50, Robert Peichaer wrote:
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my previous mail)
I didn't see that (off-list?) but there's no need to call out to /bin/expr,
we can use i=$((i+1)).
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/10/30 11:50, Robert Peichaer wrote:
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my previous mail)
I didn't see that (off-list?) but there's no need to call out to /bin/expr,
we can use i=$((i+1)).
New diff, after feedback from rpe@
Index:
On 2013/10/30 12:24, David Coppa wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/10/30 11:50, Robert Peichaer wrote:
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my previous mail)
I didn't see that (off-list?) but there's no need to call out to /bin/expr,
we can use
Bikeshedding on...
Actually not sure if it's a ksh'ism or not, but I tend to use
let i++
Either way, the backtick variant looked a bit too much.
/Alexander
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2013/10/30 11:50, Robert Peichaer wrote:
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:06:20PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/10/30 12:24, David Coppa wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/10/30 11:50, Robert Peichaer wrote:
(comments about slim.rc shell style in my previous mail)
I didn't see that
