Re: 回复: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 9.37

2024-06-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/06/05 07:41, Olivier Cherrier wrote: >     Hello, > > It works well on my side. > Any comment or plan for committing it ? /me dusts off the time machine and goes back to May 14th

Re: 回复: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 9.37

2024-06-05 Thread Olivier Cherrier
    Hello, It works well on my side. Any comment or plan for committing it ? Thanks ! Best Olivier Cherrier Phone: +352691570680 mailto:o...@symacx.com On 5/14/24 3:49 AM, wen heping wrote: Here is the patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 9.37. Now the `make test` result: Failed 2/105 test

回复: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 9.37

2024-05-13 Thread wen heping
Here is the patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 9.37. Now the `make test` result: Failed 2/105 test programs. 2/4774 subtests failed. __ 发件人: Stuart Henderson 发送时间: 2024年3月10日 22:16 收件人: wen heping 抄送: ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org 主题: Re: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo

Re: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52

2024-05-13 Thread Olivier Cherrier
wen 发件人: wen heping 发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36 收件人: Charlene Wendling 抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org 主题: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52 Here is the new patch to update p5-Mojo to 8.69. It build well and run well. 3 of all 104 te

Re: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52

2024-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
y comments? Current version in portstree is 8.22, > which is releaed five years ago. > > > Cheers ! > wen > > > 发件人: wen heping > 发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36 > 收件人: Charlene Wendling > 抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.o

回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52

2024-03-10 Thread wen heping
发件人: wen heping 发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36 收件人: Charlene Wendling 抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org 主题: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52 Here is the new patch to update p5-Mojo to 8.69. It build well and run well. 3 of all 104

Re: UPDATE www/p5-Mojo to 9.31

2023-05-29 Thread Lucas
Bump. Lucas wrote: > Bump. In the meantime, 9.32 came out, so update to it. I decided not to > include Future::AsyncAwait in here. I don't have a use for it and makes > the review easier, I guess. I'll send the port for it in another thread > later today, as the latest version requires yet

Re: UPDATE www/p5-Mojo to 9.31

2023-05-14 Thread Lucas
Bump. In the meantime, 9.32 came out, so update to it. I decided not to include Future::AsyncAwait in here. I don't have a use for it and makes the review easier, I guess. I'll send the port for it in another thread later today, as the latest version requires yet another new port. The dependants'

UPDATE www/p5-Mojo to 9.31

2023-03-13 Thread Lucas
Hello ports@, I think it might be bad timing (saw naddy@'s email about slowing down) but I've been using Mojolicious 9.31 locally for the last ~2 weeks, without noticing anything wrong. I didn't send a patch yet because I was waiting on a PR to get merged, fixing the tests for SNI. I can

回复: [UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo to p5-Mojolicious-8.73

2021-06-10 Thread wen heping
ping ... 发件人: wen heping 发送时间: 2021年5月25日 15:40 收件人: ports@openbsd.org; afre...@openbsd.org 主题: 回复: [UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo to p5-Mojolicious-8.73 Hi, Here is a updated patch for www/p5-Mojo, compare to previous patch: i) Update to 9.18 ii) Update

[UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo to p5-Mojolicious-8.73

2021-02-07 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
This update to Mojolicious 8.73 makes more of the test for the p5-Mojo-Pg update pass. However, even with this patch that adjusts expectations for libressl, there are some IPv6 TLS tests that fail. However, I cloned the mojo git repo and checked out the original commit of

Re: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52

2020-06-10 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:25:27 + wen heping wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch for www/p5-Mojo to update to 8.52. > It build well and pass all tests but one fail. One pod_coverage > tests fail, it would pass after we update p5-EV. It is a small > problem. > > 11 ports depends

[Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52

2020-06-09 Thread wen heping
Hi, Here is a patch for www/p5-Mojo to update to 8.52. It build well and pass all tests but one fail. One pod_coverage tests fail, it would pass after we update p5-EV. It is a small problem. 11 ports depends on p5-Mojo, all build and pass test with this patch. Regards, wen Index:

Re: [maintainer update] www/p5-Mojo 8.22

2019-07-25 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:25:15 +0300 Manolis Tzanidakis wrote: > Hello, > this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to the latest version, 8.22. > https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.22 > > All test pass. > > While here also switch to PERMIT_PACKAGE, as suggested by Charlene > Wendling. >

[maintainer update] www/p5-Mojo 8.22

2019-07-22 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
Hello, this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to the latest version, 8.22. https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.22 All test pass. While here also switch to PERMIT_PACKAGE, as suggested by Charlene Wendling. Index: Makefile ===

Re: [maintainer update] www/p5-Mojo 8.18

2019-06-30 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:11:01 +0300 Manolis Tzanidakis wrote: > Hello, > this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to 8.18. All tests pass. Thanks! I've found no issues while testing direct consumers as well. We should move to PERMIT_PACKAGE though. OK cwen@ (i'll commit and make the PERMIT_PACKAGE

[maintainer update] www/p5-Mojo 8.18

2019-06-30 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
Hello, this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to 8.18. All tests pass. Changes: https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.18 Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -p -u -r1.34

Re: UPDATE: p5-Mojo 8.12 (was: Re: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : update to 8.04)

2019-02-21 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
Hello, On Thu (21/02/19), Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 02:05:34PM +0100, Mark Patruck wrote: > > Hi, > > i never got TEST_IPV6/TLS to work and as i don't use Mojo in production > > anymore i also drop MAINTAINER. > > This update looks OK afresh1@, any volunteers to take

Re: UPDATE: p5-Mojo 8.12 (was: Re: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : update to 8.04)

2019-02-21 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
oc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer > > If not updated/used, they can be removed i'd say. > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Manolis Tzanidakis wrote: > > On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >Here is a patc

Re: UPDATE: p5-Mojo 8.12 (was: Re: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : update to 8.04)

2019-02-21 Thread Mark Patruck
, 2019 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Manolis Tzanidakis wrote: > On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing > > TEST_DEPENDS. > >It build and test well on my amd64 system. > > Hell

UPDATE: p5-Mojo 8.12 (was: Re: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : update to 8.04)

2019-02-20 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote: > Hi, > >Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing > TEST_DEPENDS. >It build and test well on my amd64 system. Hello ports and wen, here is another diff for version 8.12, along with the project's actual HOMEP

[Update] www/p5-Mojo : update to 8.04

2018-10-25 Thread wen heping
Hi, Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing TEST_DEPENDS. It build and test well on my amd64 system. OK ? Cheers, wen Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving

update: www/p5-Mojo 7.70

2018-03-16 Thread Mark Patruck
Update www/p5-Mojo to 7.70. This also fixes a security issue, so if you're using p5-Mojo, you should update. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -p -r1.29 Makefile

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > > > > > On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote: > > > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40. > > > > > > - since 6.33 www/p5-M

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > > On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote: > > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40. > > > > - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according > > to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP with no problems. Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports source unpacked at the end of August - (require|use).*IO::Socket::IP. We could add deps to these pretty easily.

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote: > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40. > > - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according > to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1 before the lock, so i've restored > net/p5-IO-Socket-IP from the attic (the patch is obsol

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP > with no problems. > > Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports > source unpacked at the end of August -

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Mark Patruck
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > > On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote: > > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40. > > > > - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according > > to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 01/22/16 12:32, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP > with no problems. > > Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports > source unpacked at the end of August - (require|use).*IO::Socket::IP. > We could add deps to

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/01/22 13:49, Nigel Taylor wrote: > On 01/22/16 12:32, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP > > with no problems. > > > > Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports > > source unpacked at the end of August -

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
> > *.pl/ *.pm doesn't mean there aren't just plain filenames like corelist, > > get_iplayer > > I'll run a full search then. (I don't suppose any Go users fancy > figuring out what's up with codesearch on OpenBSD do they? ;-) imapsync is the only extra one.

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 6.41

2016-01-21 Thread Mark Patruck
New p5-Mojo 6.41 and while there, i've changed the "post-install" path as well. Changes as usual: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Mojolicious Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving

Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 1/3

2016-01-20 Thread Mark Patruck
Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40. - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1 before the lock, so i've restored net/p5-IO-Socket-IP from the attic (the patch is obsolete as fixed up- stream) I've also updated ports/net/Makefile

Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 3/3

2016-01-20 Thread Mark Patruck
Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 3/3 - Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer - update textproc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer to 1.57 to cope with new p5-Mojo Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer

Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 2/3

2016-01-20 Thread Mark Patruck
Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 2/3. - lots of changes, see https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Mojolicious Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -p -r1.27 Makefile

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-10 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Mark Patruck m...@wrapped.cx wrote: IPv6 is off by default (NOINET6 flag) and that's why the test cannot create a listen socket. Btw these tests are for development only so i don't think this gets fixed upstream. On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:16:09AM -0600, Abel

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 11/07/14 05:39, Mark Patruck wrote: After debugging the '$ mojo get localhost' issue (Mojo::Reactor::EV: Write failed), it got fixed upstream, so v5.58 - which also includes a security fix (v5.48) - should be ready to update www/p5-Mojo. Nonetheless i'd like to drop a few - developer only

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-07 Thread Mark Patruck
Ok, i'll take maintainership. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile --- Makefile15 May 2014 22:30:08 - 1.13 +++ Makefile7 Nov 2014

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-07 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mark Patruck m...@wrapped.cx wrote: Ok, i'll take maintainership. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile --- Makefile

Re: Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-07 Thread Mark Patruck
IPv6 is off by default (NOINET6 flag) and that's why the test cannot create a listen socket. Btw these tests are for development only so i don't think this gets fixed upstream. On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:16:09AM -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mark

Update www/p5-Mojo 5.58 (security fix)

2014-11-06 Thread Mark Patruck
After debugging the '$ mojo get localhost' issue (Mojo::Reactor::EV: Write failed), it got fixed upstream, so v5.58 - which also includes a security fix (v5.48) - should be ready to update www/p5-Mojo. Nonetheless i'd like to drop a few - developer only - tests...at least TEST_ONLINE

Re: fix SSL and update www/p5-Mojo

2014-05-15 Thread Remi Locherer
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:01:50AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: Hi, I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I also update p5-Mojo

fix SSL and update www/p5-Mojo

2014-05-14 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I also update p5-Mojo to 4.99 as it contains other SSL fixes. ok? bluhm Index:

Re: fix SSL and update www/p5-Mojo

2014-05-14 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I also

Re: [UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo 2.76 - 4.66

2014-01-20 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Works ok for me. Tested in sparc64-current, I ran this against one of my production web apps. I'd like to highlight that Mojolicious makes some promises about backwards compatibility: http://search.cpan.org/~sri/Mojolicious-4.67/lib/Mojolicious/Guides/FAQ.pod#What_about_backwards_compatibility?

[UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo 2.76 - 4.66

2014-01-07 Thread Remi Locherer
This is a big update for the Mojolicious framework. It would be really nice if OpenBSD 5.5 would ship with an up-to-date Mojolicious package. I added two new dependencies: net/p5-IO-Socket-IP IPv6 support devel/p5-EV according to Mojo::IOLoop(3) Mojolicious scales better if it can use EV

Update www/p5-Mojo

2012-12-30 Thread Jim Razmus
Attached patch updates p5-Mojo to 3.70. Tested on i386 -current. Before I get a ok to commit, what do people think about marking textproc/p5-MojoX-Renderer-TT as broken? The TT renderer fails 'make regress' I suspect due to API changes in Mojo. We have the latest version of this module in the

Re: update - www/p5-Mojo, www/p5-MojoX-Session, textproc/p5-MojoX-Renderer-TT

2012-04-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/04/07 08:14, Jim Razmus wrote: Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current. Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD documentation in two of the modules. However, after removing TEST_POD, the regress will complete without any other errors.

Re: update - www/p5-Mojo, www/p5-MojoX-Session, textproc/p5-MojoX-Renderer-TT

2012-04-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/04/10 13:37, Remi Locherer wrote: Hi On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:43:36AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2012/04/07 08:14, Jim Razmus wrote: Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current. Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD

update - www/p5-Mojo, www/p5-MojoX-Session, textproc/p5-MojoX-Renderer-TT

2012-04-07 Thread Jim Razmus
Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current. Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD documentation in two of the modules. However, after removing TEST_POD, the regress will complete without any other errors. feedback? ok to commit? jim@ Index: p5-Mojo/Makefile