On 2024/06/05 07:41, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It works well on my side.
> Any comment or plan for committing it ?
/me dusts off the time machine and goes back to May 14th
Hello,
It works well on my side.
Any comment or plan for committing it ?
Thanks !
Best
Olivier Cherrier
Phone: +352691570680
mailto:o...@symacx.com
On 5/14/24 3:49 AM, wen heping wrote:
Here is the patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 9.37.
Now the `make test` result:
Failed 2/105 test
Here is the patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 9.37.
Now the `make test` result:
Failed 2/105 test programs. 2/4774 subtests failed.
__
发件人: Stuart Henderson
发送时间: 2024年3月10日 22:16
收件人: wen heping
抄送: ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org
主题: Re: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo
wen
发件人: wen heping
发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36
收件人: Charlene Wendling
抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org
主题: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52
Here is the new patch to update p5-Mojo to 8.69.
It build well and run well. 3 of all 104 te
y comments? Current version in portstree is 8.22,
> which is releaed five years ago.
>
>
> Cheers !
> wen
>
>
> 发件人: wen heping
> 发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36
> 收件人: Charlene Wendling
> 抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.o
发件人: wen heping
发送时间: 2020年12月30日 10:36
收件人: Charlene Wendling
抄送: Manolis Tzanidakis; ports@openbsd.org; c...@openbsd.org
主题: 回复: [Update] www/p5-Mojo : Update to 8.52
Here is the new patch to update p5-Mojo to 8.69.
It build well and run well. 3 of all 104
Bump.
Lucas wrote:
> Bump. In the meantime, 9.32 came out, so update to it. I decided not to
> include Future::AsyncAwait in here. I don't have a use for it and makes
> the review easier, I guess. I'll send the port for it in another thread
> later today, as the latest version requires yet
Bump. In the meantime, 9.32 came out, so update to it. I decided not to
include Future::AsyncAwait in here. I don't have a use for it and makes
the review easier, I guess. I'll send the port for it in another thread
later today, as the latest version requires yet another new port.
The dependants'
Hello ports@,
I think it might be bad timing (saw naddy@'s email about slowing down)
but I've been using Mojolicious 9.31 locally for the last ~2 weeks,
without noticing anything wrong. I didn't send a patch yet because I
was waiting on a PR to get merged, fixing the tests for SNI. I can
ping ...
发件人: wen heping
发送时间: 2021年5月25日 15:40
收件人: ports@openbsd.org; afre...@openbsd.org
主题: 回复: [UPDATE] www/p5-Mojo to p5-Mojolicious-8.73
Hi,
Here is a updated patch for www/p5-Mojo, compare to previous patch:
i) Update to 9.18
ii) Update
This update to Mojolicious 8.73 makes more of the test for the
p5-Mojo-Pg update pass.
However, even with this patch that adjusts expectations for libressl,
there are some IPv6 TLS tests that fail. However, I cloned the mojo git
repo and checked out the original commit of
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:25:27 +
wen heping wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for www/p5-Mojo to update to 8.52.
> It build well and pass all tests but one fail. One pod_coverage
> tests fail, it would pass after we update p5-EV. It is a small
> problem.
>
> 11 ports depends
Hi,
Here is a patch for www/p5-Mojo to update to 8.52.
It build well and pass all tests but one fail. One pod_coverage
tests fail, it would pass after we update p5-EV. It is a small problem.
11 ports depends on p5-Mojo, all build and pass test with this patch.
Regards,
wen
Index:
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:25:15 +0300
Manolis Tzanidakis wrote:
> Hello,
> this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to the latest version, 8.22.
> https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.22
>
> All test pass.
>
> While here also switch to PERMIT_PACKAGE, as suggested by Charlene
> Wendling.
>
Hello,
this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to the latest version, 8.22.
https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.22
All test pass.
While here also switch to PERMIT_PACKAGE, as suggested by Charlene
Wendling.
Index: Makefile
===
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:11:01 +0300
Manolis Tzanidakis wrote:
> Hello,
> this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to 8.18. All tests pass.
Thanks!
I've found no issues while testing direct consumers as well.
We should move to PERMIT_PACKAGE though.
OK cwen@ (i'll commit and make the PERMIT_PACKAGE
Hello,
this diff updates www/p5-Mojo to 8.18. All tests pass.
Changes: https://metacpan.org/release/SRI/Mojolicious-8.18
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -u -r1.34
Hello,
On Thu (21/02/19), Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 02:05:34PM +0100, Mark Patruck wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i never got TEST_IPV6/TLS to work and as i don't use Mojo in production
> > anymore i also drop MAINTAINER.
>
> This update looks OK afresh1@, any volunteers to take
oc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer
>
> If not updated/used, they can be removed i'd say.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Manolis Tzanidakis wrote:
> > On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >Here is a patc
, 2019 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Manolis Tzanidakis wrote:
> On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing
> > TEST_DEPENDS.
> >It build and test well on my amd64 system.
>
> Hell
On Thu (25/10/18), wen heping wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing
> TEST_DEPENDS.
>It build and test well on my amd64 system.
Hello ports and wen,
here is another diff for version 8.12, along with the project's actual
HOMEP
Hi,
Here is a patch to update www/p5-Mojo to 8.04 and add some missing
TEST_DEPENDS.
It build and test well on my amd64 system.
OK ?
Cheers,
wen
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving
Update www/p5-Mojo to 7.70. This also fixes a security issue, so
if you're using p5-Mojo, you should update.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -p -r1.29 Makefile
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote:
> > > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40.
> > >
> > > - since 6.33 www/p5-M
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote:
> > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40.
> >
> > - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according
> > to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1
I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP
with no problems.
Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports
source unpacked at the end of August - (require|use).*IO::Socket::IP.
We could add deps to these pretty easily.
On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote:
> Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40.
>
> - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according
> to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1 before the lock, so i've restored
> net/p5-IO-Socket-IP from the attic (the patch is obsol
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP
> with no problems.
>
> Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports
> source unpacked at the end of August -
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:31:38AM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 01/20/16 09:03, Mark Patruck wrote:
> > Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40.
> >
> > - since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according
> > to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1
On 01/22/16 12:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP
> with no problems.
>
> Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports
> source unpacked at the end of August - (require|use).*IO::Socket::IP.
> We could add deps to
On 2016/01/22 13:49, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> On 01/22/16 12:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I'm running amavisd/spamassassin with the updated IO::Socket::IP
> > with no problems.
> >
> > Here are all the hits from a search of .pm and .pl files from ports
> > source unpacked at the end of August -
> > *.pl/ *.pm doesn't mean there aren't just plain filenames like corelist,
> > get_iplayer
>
> I'll run a full search then. (I don't suppose any Go users fancy
> figuring out what's up with codesearch on OpenBSD do they? ;-)
imapsync is the only extra one.
New p5-Mojo 6.41 and while there, i've changed the "post-install"
path as well.
Changes as usual: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Mojolicious
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving
Update www/p5-Mojo to 6.40.
- since 6.33 www/p5-Mojo depends on IO::Socket::IP 0.37 and according
to afresh1@ we won't get Perl 5.22.1 before the lock, so i've restored
net/p5-IO-Socket-IP from the attic (the patch is obsolete as fixed up-
stream)
I've also updated ports/net/Makefile
Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 3/3 - Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer
- update textproc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer to 1.57
to cope with new p5-Mojo
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer
Update www/p5-Mojo 6.40 2/3.
- lots of changes, see
https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Mojolicious
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 Makefile
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Mark Patruck m...@wrapped.cx wrote:
IPv6 is off by default (NOINET6 flag) and that's why the
test cannot create a listen socket. Btw these tests are
for development only so i don't think this gets fixed
upstream.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:16:09AM -0600, Abel
On 11/07/14 05:39, Mark Patruck wrote:
After debugging the '$ mojo get localhost' issue (Mojo::Reactor::EV:
Write failed), it got fixed upstream, so v5.58 - which also includes
a security fix (v5.48) - should be ready to update www/p5-Mojo.
Nonetheless i'd like to drop a few - developer only
Ok, i'll take maintainership.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile
--- Makefile15 May 2014 22:30:08 - 1.13
+++ Makefile7 Nov 2014
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mark Patruck m...@wrapped.cx wrote:
Ok, i'll take maintainership.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile
--- Makefile
IPv6 is off by default (NOINET6 flag) and that's why the
test cannot create a listen socket. Btw these tests are
for development only so i don't think this gets fixed
upstream.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:16:09AM -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mark
After debugging the '$ mojo get localhost' issue (Mojo::Reactor::EV:
Write failed), it got fixed upstream, so v5.58 - which also includes
a security fix (v5.48) - should be ready to update www/p5-Mojo.
Nonetheless i'd like to drop a few - developer only - tests...at least
TEST_ONLINE
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:01:50AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading
it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be
fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I
also update p5-Mojo
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading
it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be
fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I
also update p5-Mojo to 4.99 as it contains other SSL fixes.
ok?
bluhm
Index:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Alexander Bluhm
alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL port. Upgrading
it to 1.984 breaks the www/p5-Mojo port. The latter needs to be
fixed, my patch has already been commited upstream. While there I
also
Works ok for me.
Tested in sparc64-current, I ran this against one of my
production web apps.
I'd like to highlight that Mojolicious makes some promises about
backwards compatibility:
http://search.cpan.org/~sri/Mojolicious-4.67/lib/Mojolicious/Guides/FAQ.pod#What_about_backwards_compatibility?
This is a big update for the Mojolicious framework. It would be really
nice if OpenBSD 5.5 would ship with an up-to-date Mojolicious package.
I added two new dependencies:
net/p5-IO-Socket-IP
IPv6 support
devel/p5-EV
according to Mojo::IOLoop(3) Mojolicious scales better if it can use EV
Attached patch updates p5-Mojo to 3.70. Tested on i386 -current.
Before I get a ok to commit, what do people think about marking
textproc/p5-MojoX-Renderer-TT as broken? The TT renderer fails 'make
regress' I suspect due to API changes in Mojo. We have the latest
version of this module in the
On 2012/04/07 08:14, Jim Razmus wrote:
Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current.
Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD
documentation in two of the modules. However, after removing TEST_POD,
the regress will complete without any other errors.
On 2012/04/10 13:37, Remi Locherer wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:43:36AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/04/07 08:14, Jim Razmus wrote:
Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current.
Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD
Tested all three on i386 and amd64 -current.
Note that p5-MojoX-Session will fail make regress due to the lack of POD
documentation in two of the modules. However, after removing TEST_POD,
the regress will complete without any other errors.
feedback? ok to commit?
jim@
Index: p5-Mojo/Makefile
51 matches
Mail list logo