On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:10:47AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> If context does not function at all then I would rather just revert the
> commit . I don't want
> to split this up into a bunch of sub-packages.
Fine with me, I didn't want to push anything; having boost-md prebuilt
around just me
On 6/7/2020 3:04 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020/06/07 14:18, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Looking a bit closes I can see that the userland context switching
primitives are not there in
On 2020/06/07 14:18, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Looking a bit closes I can see that the userland context switching
> > primitives are not there in
> > /usr/ports/pobj/boost_1_66_0/boost_1_66_0/libs/context/src so that
> > part is not
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Looking a bit closes I can see that the userland context switching
> > primitives are not there in
> > /usr/ports/pobj/boost_1_66_0/boost_1_66_0/libs/context/src so
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Looking a bit closes I can see that the userland context switching
> primitives are not there in
> /usr/ports/pobj/boost_1_66_0/boost_1_66_0/libs/context/src so that
> part is not going to fly. There might be other parts though that
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:14:14AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 07:57:09AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 08:29:38PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > +CC otto@, do you remember the status of context/coroutine on sparc64?
> > > I think
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 07:57:09AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 08:29:38PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > +CC otto@, do you remember the status of context/coroutine on sparc64?
> > I think they were crashing weren't they?
>
> I think they were fixed with a
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 08:29:38PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> +CC otto@, do you remember the status of context/coroutine on sparc64?
> I think they were crashing weren't they?
I think they were fixed with a compiler patch.
-Otto
>
> On 2020/06/06 01:54, Brad Smith wrote:
> > On
+CC otto@, do you remember the status of context/coroutine on sparc64?
I think they were crashing weren't they?
On 2020/06/06 01:54, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 6/6/2020 1:32 AM, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>
> > On Fri Jun 05, 2020 at 11:55:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > I thought I had already
On 6/6/2020 1:54 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 6/6/2020 1:32 AM, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
On Fri Jun 05, 2020 at 11:55:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
I thought I had already sent out (or even committed) this diff...
For another WIP port, boost-md is required is required.
I've been building and
On 6/6/2020 1:32 AM, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
On Fri Jun 05, 2020 at 11:55:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
I thought I had already sent out (or even committed) this diff...
For another WIP port, boost-md is required is required.
I've been building and linking against it just fine on sparc64.
On Fri Jun 05, 2020 at 11:55:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> I thought I had already sent out (or even committed) this diff...
>
> For another WIP port, boost-md is required is required.
> I've been building and linking against it just fine on sparc64.
>
> OK?
If it works on sparc64,
I thought I had already sent out (or even committed) this diff...
For another WIP port, boost-md is required is required.
I've been building and linking against it just fine on sparc64.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
13 matches
Mail list logo
