Re: cad/kicad status

2023-09-19 Thread Tracey Emery
On September 19, 2023 9:01:51 AM MDT, Marc Espie wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:58:31PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: >> I don't know who's interested in that port, but the main archive from >> the site doesn't match at all what we have in the backups. For starters, >> our archive is 45MB long,

Re: cad/kicad status

2023-09-19 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:58:31PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > I don't know who's interested in that port, but the main archive from > the site doesn't match at all what we have in the backups. For starters, > our archive is 45MB long, whereas the main site retrieves a file that's 322MB > long (!)

cad/kicad status

2023-09-19 Thread Marc Espie
I don't know who's interested in that port, but the main archive from the site doesn't match at all what we have in the backups. For starters, our archive is 45MB long, whereas the main site retrieves a file that's 322MB long (!) This does take more or less forever to fetch to fall on its nose,