On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 05:47:18PM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if we could get xpdf to make it's own .so and .h's so
that texlive can use them. As it stands every time we find a bug in
xpdf, we must duplicate the patch in tex live.
IMHO it would be a much better idea to nuke
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 06:58:22PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 05:47:18PM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if we could get xpdf to make it's own .so and .h's so
that texlive can use them. As it stands every time we find a bug in
xpdf, we must
Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 05:47:18PM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if we could get xpdf to make it's own .so and .h's so
that texlive can use them. As it stands every time we find a bug in
xpdf, we must duplicate the patch in tex
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 03:06:05PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I would not be rushing so much to ditch xpdf. I know of at least
couple packages from TeXLive that do not interact well with poppler.
Also epdfviewer has much to be desired about. Full screen mode doesn't
interact well with
2009/6/7, vex...@gmail.com vex...@gmail.com:
There is no PDF viewer in TL, I think it is just used for PDF synthesis
and decoding in tools like pdf2ps. I will CC you when I post the
Only for reading pdfs. debian has been using poppler with pdftex for
years.
Best
Martin (pdftex developer)
