On Thu, Mar 26 2020, Marc Espie wrote:
[...]
> Good enough for me, go for it.
Yep. Thanks a lot for improving those items!
ok jca@
> There will probably be minor tweaks after the fact by our native speaker. :)
We need more of those. 8)
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:34:24AM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Attached the 3 modified diffs again, and some comments inline.
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> > > Index: bsd.port.mk.5
> > > ===
> > > RCS
Attached the 3 modified diffs again, and some comments inline.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > Index: bsd.port.mk.5
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
> > retrieving revision
On Wed, Mar 25 2020, Paco Esteban wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
>> > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets
>> > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:11:14PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets
> > > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets
> > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies
> > declarations from foo/bar>=1.1 to
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets
> EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies
> declarations from foo/bar>=1.1 to foo/bar>=1.1v0 ??
Yes, that's the main reason that led to
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Index: bsd.port.mk.5
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
> > retrieving revision 1.527
> > diff -u -p -r1.527 bsd.port.mk.5
> > --- bsd.port.mk.5 6 Mar
On 2020/03/14 17:09, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Hi ports@,
>
> Find attached 3 diffs for bsd.ports.mk(5), packages-specs(7) and
> www/faq/ports/guide.html
>
> This comes from a question I asked yesterday about REVISION and EPOCH
> which naddy@ tried to explain to me.
>
> I think this explanation was
Hi ports@,
Find attached 3 diffs for bsd.ports.mk(5), packages-specs(7) and
www/faq/ports/guide.html
This comes from a question I asked yesterday about REVISION and EPOCH
which naddy@ tried to explain to me.
I think this explanation was really clear and simple and I have been
encouraged to add
10 matches
Mail list logo
