On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:50:26AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> This looks like the correct fix to me.
> I think only C++ cares about this kind of function signature changes.
Well, that's one instance where C++ is right to care !
Functions that don't return are pretty special.
(it's not even a
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> (ddd is cruft, the latest release dates from 2009, so this isn't
> really important.)
>
> After the libXt 1.2.0 update in xenocara, devel/ddd fails to build:
>
> --->
>
On 2020/01/16 21:57, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > (ddd is cruft, the latest release dates from 2009, so this isn't
> > really important.)
>
> What would you recommend as a "simple" gui frontend to (e)gdb then ?...
>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> (ddd is cruft, the latest release dates from 2009, so this isn't
> really important.)
What would you recommend as a "simple" gui frontend to (e)gdb then ?...
(ddd is cruft, the latest release dates from 2009, so this isn't
really important.)
After the libXt 1.2.0 update in xenocara, devel/ddd fails to build:
--->
/usr/obj/ddd-3.3.12/ddd-3.3.12/ddd/exit.C:815:12: error: no matching function
for call to 'XtAppSetErrorHandler'
