On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:51:24AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > AFAIK, once a package has an EPOCH, you can't drop it? right or wrong.
> > Either way, can somebody add a note to bsd.port.mk please?
>
> yeah, you cant remove EPOCH
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:51:24AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> AFAIK, once a package has an EPOCH, you can't drop it? right or wrong.
> Either way, can somebody add a note to bsd.port.mk please?
yeah, you cant remove EPOCH otherwise versionning goes backwards. Other
than that, no PLIST or WANTLI
AFAIK, once a package has an EPOCH, you can't drop it? right or wrong.
Either way, can somebody add a note to bsd.port.mk please?
thanks
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:38 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
> ok?
>
> Index: e/Makefile
> ===
> RCS
ok?
Index: e/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/e17/e/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -p -r1.52 Makefile
--- e/Makefile 7 Jul 2013 21:25:32 - 1.52
+++ e/Makefile 27 Nov 2013 04:30:02 -
@@ -2,11 +2,8 @@
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:43:49PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
> In my opinion, the most of the work should be done in the current SVN
> revision, and we should wait for the beta or the release before
> committing any change (which will break the already-working-but-old
> port we have). A beta is planne
Le 10/11/2012 15:15, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> To summarize the thread, we now have a long list of bugs to fix
> (armani reported some of these to me privately):
>
> - Shutdown from menu doesn't work cause it uses setuid binaries.
>(armani has a patch for a sudo-based backend)
No it works, i
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:53:56AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:17:51PM -0800, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> > I also noticed some corruption in the file manager. When holding the
> > mouse cursor over icons, it displays file previews. The file previews
> > are being read from
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:17:51PM -0800, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:07:44PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
> > > Le 09/11/2012 19:29, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> > > > I think you shouldnt even bother commenting the sha
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:07:44PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
> > Le 09/11/2012 19:29, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> > > I think you shouldnt even bother commenting the share/examples files,
> > > they can be useful. Other than that, stuart s
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:07:44PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
> Le 09/11/2012 19:29, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> > I think you shouldnt even bother commenting the share/examples files,
> > they can be useful. Other than that, stuart said exactly what i had to
> > say about the diff.
> >
> > On ppc/ati, o
On 09/11/12(Fri) 20:27, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
>
> > On ppc/ati, only composite is auto-enabled, and e produces garbled
> > colors, the bg/transparent stuff is bright blue, see
> > http://rhaalovely.net/~landry/shared/e17-openbsd-ppc-shot-2012-11
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On ppc/ati, only composite is auto-enabled, and e produces garbled
> colors, the bg/transparent stuff is bright blue, see
> http://rhaalovely.net/~landry/shared/e17-openbsd-ppc-shot-2012-11-09_18-49-45.jpg
> Probably a littleendian issue.
Pr
Le 09/11/2012 19:29, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> I think you shouldnt even bother commenting the share/examples files,
> they can be useful. Other than that, stuart said exactly what i had to
> say about the diff.
>
> On ppc/ati, only composite is auto-enabled, and e produces garbled
> colors, the bg
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:35:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/11/09 05:29, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Before making any more changes I'd like to get this committed if possible.
> > It's a large enough diff already, isn't it?
>
> Yes it is, if test reports are good then I agree with t
On 2012/11/09 05:29, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Before making any more changes I'd like to get this committed if possible.
> It's a large enough diff already, isn't it?
Yes it is, if test reports are good then I agree with this approach.
A few things I noticed (but I agree with doing this post comm
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:29:57AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give E17 a look after their recent alpha1 release
> announcement: http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news/show&l=en&news_id=62
> But our current E17 ports are based on outdated E17 development snapshots.
> So I've
Le 09/11/2012 05:29, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give E17 a look after their recent alpha1 release
> announcement: http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news/show&l=en&news_id=62
> But our current E17 ports are based on outdated E17 development snapshots.
> So I've taken the time to
17 matches
Mail list logo
