On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
Another round. Tested on i386 GENERIC.MP and emacs --batch -f
byte-compile-file: ok.
What's about this? Can it be committed?
cheers,
david
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:36:17AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
Another round. Tested on i386 GENERIC.MP and emacs --batch -f
byte-compile-file: ok.
What's about this? Can it be committed?
I've been using
David Coppa dco...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
Another round. Tested on i386 GENERIC.MP and emacs --batch -f
byte-compile-file: ok.
What's about this? Can it be committed?
I didn't have report on other arch of this
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
I've (not so heavily) tested it on my sparc64 box.
The gtk+2 flavor builds and packages fine. It also seemed to work
without particular problems in all my test cases...
Another round. Tested on i386 GENERIC.MP
Another round. Tested on i386 GENERIC.MP and emacs --batch -f
byte-compile-file: ok.
emacs.tgz
Description: Unix tar archive
--
Manuel Giraud
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to grasp through the code and
find why it fails to work with xcb or X in general.
but fortunately there's a tweak (DISABLE_SIGIO)
Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru writes:
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to grasp through the code and
find why it fails to work with xcb or X in general.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to grasp through the code and
find why it fails to
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru writes:
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to
Here's the new version of emacs 23 port. Tested and ok on i386 GENERIC.MP
emacs.tgz
Description: Unix tar archive
--
Manuel Giraud
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Manuel Giraud
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
Here's the new version of emacs 23 port. Tested and ok on i386 GENERIC.MP
In post-install, since bin/emacs and bin/emacs-${VERSION} are hard
linked to the same file, you only need to chmod -t one of them.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 15:17 +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru writes:
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to grasp through the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:26 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
re,
it turns out that SIGIO handling in emacs incorporates too many
workarounds, especially when running under X and at this point
it's impossible (at least for me) to grasp through the code and
find why it fails to work with xcb or
Hi,
Has anybody worked on an emacs23 ports? If not I'd like to try.
--
Manuel Giraud
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:47:33PM +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody worked on an emacs23 ports? If not I'd like to try.
Hi,
I have a port for this version.
I will send it later on po...@.
Regards,
--
Pierre-Emmanuel André pea at raveland.org
GPG key: 0x7AE329DC
15 matches
Mail list logo
