Re: libc++ 10.0: textproc/groff

2021-01-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Ingo Schwarze: > > In the groff port, we could add #include "config.h" to all files > > that don't do so already and include . > > I plan to prepare, test, and post patches for the groff port when i find > time (which will not take more than two days), but if others beat me to > it, i do not

Re: libc++ 10.0: textproc/groff

2021-01-07 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Christian, [textproc/groff maintainer speaking] Christian Weisgerber wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 05:24:22PM +0100: > textproc/groff fails to build with libc++ 10.0. groff blocks over > a thousand package paths, so this needs to be fixed before we can > switch to the newer libc++. > >

libc++ 10.0: textproc/groff

2021-01-06 Thread Christian Weisgerber
textproc/groff fails to build with libc++ 10.0. groff blocks over a thousand package paths, so this needs to be fixed before we can switch to the newer libc++. Analysis: groff includes a copy of gnulib. gnulib provides *.h wrappers for some standard header files. Those wrappers are not