On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:18:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, D. Adam Karim wrote:
I never even heard of madplay until I just read these emails. Let me say,
it is nice!!! I was using mp3blaster but it has some strange bug going on
where one cannot adjust the volume down,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, D. Adam Karim wrote:
I never even heard of madplay until I just read these emails. Let me say, it
is nice!!! I was using mp3blaster but it has some strange bug going on where
one cannot adjust the volume down, only up. Maybe it's just me, hehe.
Anyways, I'm liking
That is most sad! But I have gotten used to using madplay now. I miss being
able to quickly selet a song, but random works just as well when I'm not really
in the mood to listen to a particular song.
On Sun Aug 07, 2005 at 05:18:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, D. Adam Karim
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:22:04 -0700
D. Adam Karim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is most sad! But I have gotten used to using madplay now. I miss being
able to quickly selet a song, but random works just as well when I'm not
really in the mood to listen to a particular song.
xhippo makes for a
Seams like a nice program, except that I do not use X. I will try it next time
I do install it though! Thanks.
On Mon Aug 08, 2005 at 11:09:19AM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:22:04 -0700
D. Adam Karim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is most sad! But I have gotten used to
Robert Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add the arm to NOT_FOR_ARCHS because mpg123 is quiet unusable
without an FPU. People should use mpg321 instead, or mplayer with the
mad flavor.
Or madplay. From the people who wrote libmad in the first place.
Not that it has any particular advantage, but
I think they choose the ones they know. That's why a lot of
people are still using mpg123, but everyone knows what is just
sucks. Not to mention that it had a lot of security vulns in
the past on the HOMEPAGE they say it is not even maintained
anymore so don't download the source code from them.
