On Wed, 6 Sep 2023, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 02:28:33PM -0400, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > In the meantime I'd rather consider removing lang/haxe which has been
> > > marked BROKEN for years. Removing haxe would mean we could remove
> > > ocaml-camlp5 whic
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 02:28:33PM -0400, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
[...]
> > In the meantime I'd rather consider removing lang/haxe which has been
> > marked BROKEN for years. Removing haxe would mean we could remove
> > ocaml-camlp5 which is the only thing I found that gets in the way of
> > updat
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 01:04:30PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:28 PM Volker Schlecht
> wrote:
> >
> > Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant
> > future,
> > what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
> > lang/
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:28 PM Volker Schlecht
wrote:
>
> Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant future,
> what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
> lang/ocaml-camlp4
> around?
I don't see any rush to remove mldonkey if it still works
On 2023/09/05 18:26, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant future,
> what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
> lang/ocaml-camlp4
> around?
>
> Maybe it's just me, but for net/mldonkey not even the homepage stil
On Tue Sep 05, 2023 at 06:26:56PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant future,
> what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
> lang/ocaml-camlp4
> around?
>
> Maybe it's just me, but for net/mldonkey not ev
Le mardi 05 septembre 2023 à 18:26 +0200, Volker Schlecht a écrit :
> Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant
> future,
> what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
> lang/ocaml-camlp4
> around?
>
> Maybe it's just me, but for net/mldonkey n
Looking towards an upgrade to Ocaml 5.x sometime in the not-so-distant future,
what are the opinions on net/mldonkey which still ties us to keeping
lang/ocaml-camlp4
around?
Maybe it's just me, but for net/mldonkey not even the homepage still loads ...
