Re: new net/icinga/web2-module-graphite

2019-02-26 Thread Martijn van Duren
On 2/19/19 3:44 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I think it needs to say somewhere that it requires graphite-web which > is not available in ports. (There's extra risk of confusion because > we do have graphics/graphite2 which is something else). I already submitted a port for py-graphite-web about

Re: new net/icinga/web2-module-graphite

2019-02-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
I think it needs to say somewhere that it requires graphite-web which is not available in ports. (There's extra risk of confusion because we do have graphics/graphite2 which is something else). As you have it now (bearing in mind that it pulls in ../Makefile.inc) it has me listed as maintainer,

Re: new net/icinga/web2-module-graphite

2019-02-18 Thread Martijn van Duren
ping On 11/27/18 2:26 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote: > Here's a port of web2-module-graphite. I took web2-module-director as a > basis, which worked well enough. > > The diff is for a quirk when having a service check based on > snmp-storage. The check uses regexes and anchoring with a '^' is

Re: new net/icinga/web2-module-graphite

2019-01-24 Thread Martijn van Duren
ping On 11/27/18 2:26 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote: > Here's a port of web2-module-graphite. I took web2-module-director as a > basis, which worked well enough. > > The diff is for a quirk when having a service check based on > snmp-storage. The check uses regexes and anchoring with a '^' is

new net/icinga/web2-module-graphite

2018-11-27 Thread Martijn van Duren
Here's a port of web2-module-graphite. I took web2-module-director as a basis, which worked well enough. The diff is for a quirk when having a service check based on snmp-storage. The check uses regexes and anchoring with a '^' is stored as is by icinga2-graphite, while web2-module-graphite