On 25 Aug 2015, at 18:15, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
> ok jca@
>
Thanks! All committed now.
>
> - regarding bison, "it's complicated"
I'm just trying to figure out if it's worth the hassle of removing the
minor bison feature used in the aspcud porting chain, or wait for a
bison upd
ok jca@
Slightly longer version:
Hi Anil,
- regarding bison, "it's complicated"
- this is a pretty big diff, I didn't review everything, only the bits
I care about. (I don't use opam, for example.) For next updates, can
we expect OCaml to be updated alone, along with updates required
b
On 17 August 2015 at 15:37, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 17 August 2015 at 15:30, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun,
>>>
>>> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without
>>> problem. It appears this is not native
On 17 Aug 2015, at 12:37, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>
> Firing up -4 on my i386 test box while you wait for the ports@ ok. :-)
>
> What was the issue with ocaml-camlimage?
It was missing an explicit dependency on lablgtk, and so it got skipped
from the configure script when rebuilt on a clean p
On 17 August 2015 at 15:30, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>
>> On Sun,
>>
>> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without
>> problem. It appears this is not native as
>> infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has:
>> OCAML_NATIVE_AR
On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> On Sun,
>
> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without
> problem. It appears this is not native as
> infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has:
> OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64
> OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 a
On 16 August 2015 at 10:02, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:40, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>
>> On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>>
>>> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
>>> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocam
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:40, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >
> > On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >>
> >> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
> >> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/
On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:40, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
> On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>
>> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
>> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt
>>
>> It bumps the REVISION of most of
On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt
>
> It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary
> compat is not preser
On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt
>
> It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary
> compat is not preser
This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3:
http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt
It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary compat
is not preserved across OCaml revisions.
Any tests on non-x86 would be appre
12 matches
Mail list logo
