Vijay Sankar wrote:
[...]
I hate to waste developer and port maintainer time, so apologize in advance
for this long message. Anyways, if there is anything useful I can do to help,
please let me know.
I think we will soon see an OpenLDAP update proposed on ports@, and you
can definitely help
On 2008/01/02 11:13, Vijay Sankar wrote:
I am puzzled about why I don't seem to have any problems with OpenLDAP
2.3.33p2 on
Do you have db 4.2.52 libs still installed? (.libs-db-4.2.5something
package showing in pkg_info)?
On January 2, 2008 11:27:17 am Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/01/02 11:13, Vijay Sankar wrote:
I am puzzled about why I don't seem to have any problems with OpenLDAP
2.3.33p2 on
Do you have db 4.2.52 libs still installed? (.libs-db-4.2.5something
package showing in pkg_info)?
Thanks very
On January 2, 2008 11:27:17 am Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/01/02 11:13, Vijay Sankar wrote:
I am puzzled about why I don't seem to have any problems with OpenLDAP
2.3.33p2 on
Do you have db 4.2.52 libs still installed? (.libs-db-4.2.5something
package showing in pkg_info)?
As usual,
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
Quoting Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using