> > Unfortunately, building at least on sparc64 does not complete.
> > Curiously it also does not fail, it just stops after 'mk' is compiled.
> > So I think ONLY_FOR_ARCHES may need to be retained, with the platforms
> > we have tested.
sure, it fails on aarch64 as well, requires a couple of
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 8:37 AM Gleydson Soares wrote:
> sure, it fails on aarch64 as well, requires a couple of tweaks to make it
> build, will check it afterwards as soon as I prepare a diff to bring it
> to latest github commit.
The patches/patch-src_mkhdr diff does not seem to be required
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:38:12 -0700
Kyle Milz wrote:
> Unfortunately, building at least on sparc64 does not complete.
> Curiously it also does not fail, it just stops after 'mk' is compiled.
> So I think ONLY_FOR_ARCHES may need to be retained, with the platforms
> we have tested.
Thank you for
Hi George,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM George Koehler wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:48:34 -0700
> Kyle Milz wrote:
>
> > Recently I needed plan9port for i386 and to my surprise it builds and
> > light testing of mk and acme work fine.
> >
> > I was curious if macppc was also fixed, so I
On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:48:34 -0700
Kyle Milz wrote:
> Recently I needed plan9port for i386 and to my surprise it builds and
> light testing of mk and acme work fine.
>
> I was curious if macppc was also fixed, so I built and tested that as
> well, with the same results.
Good find! I can also
Hi,
Recently I needed plan9port for i386 and to my surprise it builds and
light testing of mk and acme work fine.
I was curious if macppc was also fixed, so I built and tested that as
well, with the same results.
Diff below re-enables these architectures.
? plan9port_i386_powerpc.diff
Index:
