On Mon, 24 May 2021 18:18:44 +0300, Vadim Zhukov
wrote:
> > Anyway, here's the new version of the diff:
> >
> > diff efc26b0628a018a694a05768ccbc773a0ed2e5ad /usr/ports
> > blob - bb8568b21b82fed260785c869a3cecfc4d4816cb
> > file + infrastructure/bin/portcheck
> > ---
пн, 24 мая 2021 г., 16:30 Paco Esteban :
>
> Hi Vadim, thanks for the input.
> Comments below.
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2021, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>
> > вс, 23 мая 2021 г. в 17:43, Paco Esteban :
> > >
> > > Hi ports@,
> > >
> > > This makes portcheck(1) not complain about modules.inc being an extra
> >
Hi Vadim, thanks for the input.
Comments below.
On Mon, 24 May 2021, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> вс, 23 мая 2021 г. в 17:43, Paco Esteban :
> >
> > Hi ports@,
> >
> > This makes portcheck(1) not complain about modules.inc being an extra
> > file. This file is now being included on some Go ports, and
вс, 23 мая 2021 г. в 17:43, Paco Esteban :
>
> Hi ports@,
>
> This makes portcheck(1) not complain about modules.inc being an extra
> file. This file is now being included on some Go ports, and I guess it
> can be used also on Rust ports.
>
> I was wondering if we should perform any other tests
Hi ports@,
This makes portcheck(1) not complain about modules.inc being an extra
file. This file is now being included on some Go ports, and I guess it
can be used also on Rust ports.
I was wondering if we should perform any other tests on this files, as
we do for Makefiles with the
