On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:46:20 +
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/01/24 19:45, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > Hi ports,
> >
> > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//powerpc/2018-12-14/x11/xscreensaver.log
> > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2018-12-19/x11/xscreensaver.log
>
On 2019/01/24 19:45, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> Hi ports,
>
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//powerpc/2018-12-14/x11/xscreensaver.log
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2018-12-19/x11/xscreensaver.log
>
> What i'm proposing here is simply let ports-gcc build it on
On Thu Jan 24, 2019 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> Hi ports,
>
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//powerpc/2018-12-14/x11/xscreensaver.log
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2018-12-19/x11/xscreensaver.log
>
> What i'm proposing here is simply let ports-gcc
Hi ports,
> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//powerpc/2018-12-14/x11/xscreensaver.log
> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2018-12-19/x11/xscreensaver.log
What i'm proposing here is simply let ports-gcc build it on ports-gcc
archs, instead of using base-gcc. This reduces the
