Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-30 Thread kwesterback
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 12:29 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 03:11:26AM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 >>> Marc Espie wrote: >>> Not okay.

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-30 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 03:11:26AM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 > > Marc Espie wrote: > > > > > Not okay. > > > > > > You also want an entry in quirks explaining about them

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-30 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > I added the removed packages to quirks with reason 7. Reason 5 would > also apply. is this ok (espie@ ?) 7 is fine. > I'd like to wait for another week and then commit if no one objects. OK kn

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-29 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 > Marc Espie wrote: > > > Not okay. > > > > You also want an entry in quirks explaining about them, and what to > > do. > > I added the removed packages to quirks with reason 7. Reason 5

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-17 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 > Marc Espie wrote: > > > Not okay. > > > > You also want an entry in quirks explaining about them, and what to > > do. > > I added the removed packages to quirks with reason 7. Reason 5

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-17 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 Marc Espie wrote: > Not okay. > > You also want an entry in quirks explaining about them, and what to > do. I added the removed packages to quirks with reason 7. Reason 5 would also apply. is this ok (espie@ ?) I'd like to wait for another week and then commit

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-15 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:08:45PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all > > (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no > >

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-14 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all > (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no > longer used by other ports. Since active OCaml users will use opam > instead of O

remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-11 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi, switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no longer used by other ports. Since active OCaml users will use opam instead of OpenBSD ports I would suggest to remove them from the ports tree. The following diff

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

2019-03-11 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all > (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no > longer used by other ports. Since active OCaml users will use opam > instead of O