I suggest using ${PATCHORIG} rather than hardcoding to any particular value..
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 24 December 2023 00:53:05 George Koehler wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 23:46:33 +0100
Theo Buehler wrote:
Please go ahead, I can cope.
I committed it. Now
On 2023-12-23 7:52 p.m., George Koehler wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 23:46:33 +0100
Theo Buehler wrote:
Please go ahead, I can cope.
I committed it. Now if anyone runs update-plist, my commit adds
cpu_relax.hpp.orig.port to this warning,
Warning: entries NOT added to boost-1.84.0p0v0:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 23:46:33 +0100
Theo Buehler wrote:
> Please go ahead, I can cope.
I committed it. Now if anyone runs update-plist, my commit adds
cpu_relax.hpp.orig.port to this warning,
Warning: entries NOT added to boost-1.84.0p0v0:
include/boost/atomic/detail/futex.hpp.orig.port
On 2023-12-23 5:44 p.m., George Koehler wrote:
devel/boost is broken on powerpc and powerpc64, because
picks the wrong asm syntax.
This patch fixes it, ok?
The REVISION bump conflicts with tb's "boost futex diff";
I will do REVISION= 1 if tb commits before me.
--gkoehler
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 05:44:43PM -0500, George Koehler wrote:
> devel/boost is broken on powerpc and powerpc64, because
> picks the wrong asm syntax.
> This patch fixes it, ok?
ok
> The REVISION bump conflicts with tb's "boost futex diff";
> I will do REVISION= 1 if tb commits before me.
>
devel/boost is broken on powerpc and powerpc64, because
picks the wrong asm syntax.
This patch fixes it, ok?
The REVISION bump conflicts with tb's "boost futex diff";
I will do REVISION= 1 if tb commits before me.
--gkoehler
Index: Makefile
