Re: upcoming textproc/groff-1.23.0

2020-11-16 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Ingo Schwarze: > > It is GNU project policy that distribution tarballs include > > pre-formatted .info files so that makeinfo is NOT required. > > tar -tzvf groff-1.23.0.rc1.tar.gz | grep -F .info > > tells me the groff project doesn't include it in the tarball, but > maybe i can convince

Re: upcoming textproc/groff-1.23.0

2020-11-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback! I really appreaciate that. I will look at making a leaner version of the port avoiding the TeXLive dependency. I'll explore the options and come back to you. It's not yet urgent because the release has not yet arrived, but it's very good that i already

Re: upcoming textproc/groff-1.23.0

2020-11-15 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Ingo Schwarze: > There is another reason why now is a good time to switch priorities. > Upstream has been doing lots of work on documentation, and in that > context, they decided to use newer makeinfo(1) features that our > ancient /usr/bin/makeinfo does not support. The natural consequence > is

Re: upcoming textproc/groff-1.23.0

2020-11-13 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
Hi Ingo, On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 08:14:55PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > -DISTNAME = groff-${VERSION} > -REVISION = 4 > +DISTNAME = groff-${VERSION}.rc1 > +PKGNAME =groff-${VERSION} I think you could set: PKGNAME = groff-${VERSION}rc1 That would allow

upcoming textproc/groff-1.23.0

2020-11-13 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Bertrand Garrigues put up a release candidate for the upcoming groff-1.23.0 release. Here is an update of our textproc/groff port NOT INTENDED FOR COMMIT. Before commit, i will wait for the official release. But i'm sending this out early such that people who like to can test for