Re: [Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.03.0

2024-03-07 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:20:11PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Updates print/ghostscript/gnu to latest release 10.03.0 > > This is marked as a security release, but the only documented vulnerability > affects builds with tesseract enabled. In our port we disable it, so we seem > to be

[Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.03.0

2024-03-07 Thread Volker Schlecht
Updates print/ghostscript/gnu to latest release 10.03.0 This is marked as a security release, but the only documented vulnerability affects builds with tesseract enabled. In our port we disable it, so we seem to be unaffected. https://ghostscript.readthedocs.io/en/gs10.03.0/News.html Built and

Re: [Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.02.0

2023-09-19 Thread Volker Schlecht
Not intended as a ping, but updating the diff to use SITES rather than MASTER_SITES. On 9/14/23 19:54, Volker Schlecht wrote: Ghostscript just released version 10.02.0 The major change is the removal of the old PDF interpreter. The new one has been the default since 10.0.0 and the possibility

[Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.02.0

2023-09-14 Thread Volker Schlecht
Ghostscript just released version 10.02.0 The major change is the removal of the old PDF interpreter. The new one has been the default since 10.0.0 and the possibility to fall back to the old PDF interpreter is gone since 10.01.0. I'm not aware that this caused any trouble, so I don't expect

[maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.01.2

2023-06-21 Thread Volker Schlecht
ghostscript was just released as 10.01.2 No named security content (yet), but this commit is pretty explicit: https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=9af4197bdccd4b65ed35a8ad2be075c3de2f0555 Overall, the diff is small and seems to be centered around getting the fix mentioned

Re: [Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.01.1

2023-04-11 Thread Volker Schlecht
Pinging again, since I just got aware of this CVE: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28879 The patch should apply to -stable and work there just as well. On 4/8/23 11:24, Volker Schlecht wrote: Ping On 3/31/23 19:37, Volker Schlecht wrote: Update ghostscript to the latest release

Re: [Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.01.1

2023-04-08 Thread Volker Schlecht
Ping On 3/31/23 19:37, Volker Schlecht wrote: Update ghostscript to the latest release 10.01.1 Lots of changes, most of which are considered bugfixes. This release deprecates the old PDF interpreter (the new one was already default in 10.0.0). Other changes: * Remove workaround to handle

[Maintainer Update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.01.1

2023-03-31 Thread Volker Schlecht
Update ghostscript to the latest release 10.01.1 Lots of changes, most of which are considered bugfixes. This release deprecates the old PDF interpreter (the new one was already default in 10.0.0). Other changes: * Remove workaround to handle different version string formats - not needed

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-10-06 Thread Volker Schlecht
bowser pointed out (thanks!) that I forgot to update MASTER_SITES when working around the version confusion (10.00.0 and 10.0.0 are used inconsistently). Fix attached. On 10/4/22 16:16, Volker Schlecht wrote: Here's the update to ghostscript 10.0 with the version bump to the shared

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-10-04 Thread Volker Schlecht
Here's the update to ghostscript 10.0 with the version bump to the shared lib.Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.124 diff -u -p -r1.124 Makefile --- Makefile 3 Jul 2022

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-09-23 Thread Volker Schlecht
Since there's no documented security content, there's probably no harm in waiting until after 7.2 with that one if the update is deemed too risky. It looks to me like a lot of dynamic exports have been removed. I think we should bump the major shared lib version. Post 7.2 please Fair

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-09-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/09/23 12:06, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Sep 22, 2022 at 08:32:46PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > And now also with update-patches ... > > > > On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0 > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-09-23 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Sep 22, 2022 at 08:32:46PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote: > And now also with update-patches ... > > On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0 > > Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version > > is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-09-22 Thread Volker Schlecht
And now also with update-patches ... On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote: Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0 Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we need some gymnastics to not break PLIST substitution. Since there's no

[maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.0.0

2022-09-22 Thread Volker Schlecht
Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0 Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we need some gymnastics to not break PLIST substitution. Since there's no documented security content, there's probably no harm in waiting until after 7.2

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.56.1

2022-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/04/13 12:57, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > On 4/13/22 12:30, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > That said, I don't think it is necessary to include a pkg-readme for > > this at all. > > Fair enough, here's the patch without pkg/README for completeness' sake. Thanks, builds went OK so I've

Re: [maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.56.1

2022-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/04/13 12:05, Volker Schlecht wrote: > This updates ghostscript to 9.56.1 There is a standard format which should be used for pkg-readme files. That said, I don't think it is necessary to include a pkg-readme for this at all. The change is clearly mentioned in upstream's release notes and

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-25 Thread Volker Schlecht
Hi, On 1/25/22 20:09, Matthias Kilian wrote: Everything looked ok for me. Thanks for working on the update. If there are no complaints from other people, I'll commit it later this week. Ok, cool! Do you still want to take maintainership? Then I'll adjust MAINTAINER accordingly. Sure,

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-25 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 07:19:42PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Sorry to bother you about it, but did you get around to having a look at the > > patch? > > Looks good so far, I also ran dpb -uR to rebuild any packages

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-24 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, and sorry for the delay, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Sorry to bother you about it, but did you get around to having a look at the > patch? Looks good so far, I also ran dpb -uR to rebuild any packages depending on it, without any problems. I'll do some

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-24 Thread Volker Schlecht
Sorry to bother you about it, but did you get around to having a look at the patch? On 1/17/22 20:51, Matthias Kilian wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:12:25PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: Update with Makefile in the same order as the current port, I hope this makes reviewing easier.

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-17 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:12:25PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Update with Makefile in the same order as the current port, I hope this > makes reviewing easier. Thanks! I'll have a look and do some tests during this week. Ciao, Kili > Index: Makefile >

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-17 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:55:23PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:16:14PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports > > libraries, except for jbig2dec. Here the version in ports is too old. > > > > I

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-17 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:16:14PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Hi, > > ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports > libraries, except for jbig2dec. Here the version in ports is too old. > > I bumped the shared object version from 15.0 to 16.0 - not sure if that's >

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-16 Thread Volker Schlecht
Update with Makefile in the same order as the current port, I hope this makes reviewing easier. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.117 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.117 Makefile ---

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Volker Schlecht
And now without the gtk flavour as default ... :( On 1/14/22 22:56, Volker Schlecht wrote: ... and here's ghostscript using it. On 1/14/22 22:35, Brad Smith wrote: On 1/14/2022 2:16 PM, Volker Schlecht wrote: Hi, ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Volker Schlecht
... and here's ghostscript using it. On 1/14/22 22:35, Brad Smith wrote: On 1/14/2022 2:16 PM, Volker Schlecht wrote: Hi, ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports libraries, except for jbig2dec. Here the version in ports is too old. jbig2dec has been

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Volker Schlecht
On 1/14/22 21:20, Stuart Henderson wrote: reformatting the whole makefile in an update (especially for a complex port) makes it really hard to see what's changed, making review more difficult and take longer Yes, sorry about that. But I did follow kili@'s advice and started to build the

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:26:28PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/01/14 17:05, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > > As this new version is no longer 'gnu ghostscript', shouldn't the path > > change > > to just print/ghostscript? > > No because there is another subdirectory under print/ghostscript

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/01/14 17:05, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > As this new version is no longer 'gnu ghostscript', shouldn't the path change > to just print/ghostscript? No because there is another subdirectory under print/ghostscript Maybe it could change to something else, but should be decoupled from the

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/01/14 20:20, Stuart Henderson wrote: > : +FLAVOR?= no_x11 > > not sure but having this as default might well cause issues with other ports scrub the "not sure"; libspectre requires a not no_x11 build and that's depended on by various other ports, we can't have a

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
some quick comments (some of them apply to your lang/node update too), reformatting the whole makefile in an update (especially for a complex port) makes it really hard to see what's changed, making review more difficult and take longer also re formatting, you add quite a lot of horizontal

Re: [UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:16:14PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports > libraries, except for jbig2dec. Here the version in ports is too old. > > I bumped the shared object version from 15.0 to 16.0 - not sure if that's > advisable

[UPDATE] print/ghostscript/gnu 9.55.0

2022-01-14 Thread Volker Schlecht
Hi, ok, so here's my first attempt. I did manage to use system and ports libraries, except for jbig2dec. Here the version in ports is too old. I bumped the shared object version from 15.0 to 16.0 - not sure if that's advisable and/or necessary, but I think for a first shot it's pretty good

Update print/ghostscript/gnu (to 9.07 for now)

2013-12-17 Thread Matthias Kilian
Intermediate update to ghostscript-9.07. Yes, I know gs-9.10 is already out, but I'd like to do this in smaller steps. Please note that this version lacks JPX support (because the patched jasper had been removed and I didn't yet manage to get gs built with openjpeg). Ciao, Kili Index:

update print/ghostscript/gnu

2012-07-08 Thread Matthias Kilian
Update ghostscript to 9.05. THe following devices had been added (+) or deleted (-): +cdnj500 +eplcolor +eplmono +inkcov +pamcmyk4 +plan +planc +plang +plank +planm +tiff48nc +tiff64nc

update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-11-15 Thread Matthias Kilian
Update to ghostscript-9.94, ugly as usual. This also enables jbig2dec support. There are probably some new devices supported by ghostscript-9.04, but I didn't yet update the supported devices. This can be done later in a separate commit. Ciao, Kili Index: Makefile

Re: update print/ghostscript/gnu (for real)

2011-05-24 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Update to ghostscript-9.00. Better than what I had during p2k10, and shoulnd't be worse than the old 8.63 we've in the tree. Please test and/or comment. If I don't get any negative feedback within the next two weeks, I'll just commit it. Installs and works fine on amd64. No problems,

update: print/ghostscript/gnu (was: graphics/evince weirdness)

2009-01-18 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:41:30PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Why can't evince depend on -gtk flavor directly if it is needed to operate? This fallout is being worked on. Eventually libgs may end up in ghostscript proper and the issue will disappear. Give us a couple more days. Here

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu (was: graphics/evince weirdness)

2009-01-18 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:34:52PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: This fallout is being worked on. Eventually libgs may end up in ghostscript proper and the issue will disappear. Give us a couple more days. Thank kili@, very good news ! I will have an intensive look at this tomorrow.

update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-11-12 Thread Matthias Kilian
This removes the cups flavor from ghostscript and instead enables the cups driver for all flavors, using dlopen(3) to load the cups libraries. ajacoutot@ already tested the modified cups driver with a previous version of the diff; this new one just adds the necessary changes to actually get rid

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-31 Thread Matthias Kilian
Apart from the pstoraster discussion, did anyone even TEST this? That's: build it, install it, use it, look whether it breaks something. If not: fine, i'll commit it and wait for people crying. Here's a new update for THE THING[tm]: Note that the pam device has been renamed to pamcmyk32.

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-25 Thread Matthias Kilian
Meuser wrote: Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:44:35 + From: Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 53.6595 ) On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:32:13PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-25 Thread Jacob Meuser
+ From: Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 53.6595 ) On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:32:13PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-23 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote: i'm 99% sure the cups flavor isn't really necessary. pstoraster is used by some of the PPD files shipped with cups, but the printers they support are better supported by foomatic. If we go this way, then gutenprint cups flavor should be removed too.

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-23 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:21:56AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote: i'm 99% sure the cups flavor isn't really necessary. pstoraster is used by some of the PPD files shipped with cups, but the printers they support are better supported by foomatic. If

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-23 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote: yep. I've never used that stuff to print with gutenprint drivers under cups. I did... and still do on several boxen. But it is no issue to use foomatic instead of course. the only references to 'gimp-print', 'gutenprint' or 'stp' in the hplip sources

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-23 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:32:13PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote: yep. I've never used that stuff to print with gutenprint drivers under cups. I did... and still do on several boxen. But it is no issue to use foomatic instead of course. just to be

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-23 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jacob Meuser wrote: just to be clear, you can still use cups. just use the foomatic generated PPD files instead of the ones that come with cups. and be sure to use the gimp-print-ijs drivers instead of the gimp-print drivers. Of course, this is what I meant :-) --

update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-22 Thread Matthias Kilian
Here's a new update for THE THING[tm]: Note that the pam device has been renamed to pamcmyk32. However, it's still available as pam. I'll stick with upstream here, so at one day in the far future, pam may just disappear. Another note (which also applies to ghostscript-8.60): the -cups flavor has

Re: update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2008-03-22 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:26:48AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: Here's a new update for THE THING[tm]: Note that the pam device has been renamed to pamcmyk32. However, it's still available as pam. I'll stick with upstream here, so at one day in the far future, pam may just disappear.

update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2007-12-26 Thread Matthias Kilian
Update to ghostscript-8.61 (mostly bug fix release). This also fixes some linking problem for the gtk-cups flavor. Please comment and test. Ciao, Kili Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: Update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2007-11-04 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:33:27AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: this needs some testing. For now, pdfwrite seems to be broken at least on powerpc and arm (but it works on amd64). If you need some test files for it, see http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/testgs (run the testgs.sh script on the .ps

Re: Update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2007-11-04 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:41:59PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:33:27AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: this needs some testing. For now, pdfwrite seems to be broken at least on powerpc and arm (but it works on amd64). If you need some test files for it, see

Update: print/ghostscript/gnu

2007-10-27 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, this needs some testing. For now, pdfwrite seems to be broken at least on powerpc and arm (but it works on amd64). If you need some test files for it, see http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/testgs (run the testgs.sh script on the .ps files). However, I'll debug this soon, so other tests and bug