On 2024/03/20 09:39, Nils Reuße wrote:
> This update brings time warrior to the latest 1.7.1. It builds and runs fine
> in my arm64-VM.
: -MODPY_VERSION = ${MODPY_DEFAULT_VERSION_2}
\o/
> Maybe someone knows a better way how to handle this, comments are very
> welcome :)
this was enough:
Hi,
This update brings time warrior to the latest 1.7.1. It builds and runs fine in
my arm64-VM.
Tests are now enabled, but in a somewhat hacky way, because my cmake-skills are
nonexistent. When running `make test` outside the ports directory, cmake does
the right thing, but using the ports
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:55 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/08/03 12:24, Ashlen wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:37 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > you can get tests to run with these (and this also needs
> > > SEPARATE_BUILD = No otherwise when it builds the .t binaries, it puts
> >
On 2023/08/03 12:24, Ashlen wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:37 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > you can get tests to run with these (and this also needs
> > SEPARATE_BUILD = No otherwise when it builds the .t binaries, it puts
> > them in the build dir, and there's nothing setup to replace the
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:37 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> you can get tests to run with these (and this also needs
> SEPARATE_BUILD = No otherwise when it builds the .t binaries, it puts
> them in the build dir, and there's nothing setup to replace the MacOS
> binaries present in the test dir in
you can get tests to run with these (and this also needs
SEPARATE_BUILD = No otherwise when it builds the .t binaries, it puts
them in the build dir, and there's nothing setup to replace the MacOS
binaries present in the test dir in the tar).
TEST_DEPENDS = ${MODPY_RUN_DEPENDS}
USE_NINJA
Updates productivity/timewarrior from 1.1.1 to 1.5.0.
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/timewarrior/releases/tag/v1.5.0
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/timewarrior/compare/v1.1.1...v1.5.0
I looked to see if NO_TESTING could be removed, but didn't see an
obvious way to get tests to
On 2021/11/18 02:49, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:35:08PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for caring about taskwarrior. Any chance that you can update
> > > timewarrior too? Since the two are kind of siblings
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:35:08PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, Erling Westenvik wrote:
>
> > Thanks for caring about taskwarrior. Any chance that you can update
> > timewarrior too? Since the two are kind of siblings from the same
> > developers I mean? Our 1.1.1p0 lags
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> Thanks for caring about taskwarrior. Any chance that you can update
> timewarrior too? Since the two are kind of siblings from the same
> developers I mean? Our 1.1.1p0 lags awfully behind the official 1.4.3.
I don't use timewarrior at all, so I
10 matches
Mail list logo
