Committed, with a few tweaks, thanks.
> -REVISION = 6
> +GH_TAGNAME = v0.26.0
> +REVISION = 0
Remove REVISION rather than setting it to 0
> +MAINTAINER = Purple Rain
Thanks.
> Index: crates.mk
I took the liberty of renaming that to crates.inc, as is done in most
other rust-based ports.
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:23:05AM -0600, Purple Rain wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This update sn0int from 0.24.1 to 0.26.0.
>
> Tested on amd64, works fine. Ok?
If you use this, could you ask upstream if they could not update their
ring dependency? This would allow using sn0int with better asm on more
hey!
thanks for pointing this out. The project does explicitly enable the
`use-pkg-config` feature to enforce dynamic linking, I just forgot to
add it to WANTLIB as well.
I've attached a new patch.
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:58:54AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:49:11AM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> hi!
>
> this patch imports the latest version and drops the patches that have
> been upstreamed (patch follows).
I will take a look.
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file:
hi!
this patch imports the latest version and drops the patches that have
been upstreamed (patch follows).
Thanks!
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/sn0int/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 10:02:51PM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> I've tried to track down these issues (unfortunatly I only have an amd64
> testsystem right now):
>
> ## i386
>
> It seems the issue was in typenum and also showed up in librsvg in
> debian[1], where it was fixed by cherry-picking a
I've tried to track down these issues (unfortunatly I only have an amd64
testsystem right now):
## i386
It seems the issue was in typenum and also showed up in librsvg in
debian[1], where it was fixed by cherry-picking a patch[2] from
upstream. This commit was part of the typenum 1.11.0 release,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:31:35AM +0200, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a similar diff, if no one complain I will commit this tomorrow.
o/
I am complaining :)
First, a general remark: I strongly want that such Rust port to have a
maintainer. Else, it means I will have to do
Hello,
I have a similar diff, if no one complain I will commit this tomorrow.
Thanks
Cheers.-
On Mon, 09 Sep 2019 at 03:09:51 +, kpcyrd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch imports the latest version and drops the patches that have
> been upstreamed in the meantime.
>
> (long diff follows)
>
>
Hi,
this patch imports the latest version and drops the patches that have
been upstreamed in the meantime.
(long diff follows)
Thanks!
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/sn0int/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.4
10 matches
Mail list logo
