this updates dillo to its latest version
Changelog: https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/releases/tag/v3.1.0
make port-lib-depends-check is happy, portcheck too
built fine in a clean proot using dpb
I had to pull in gtk4 because of the following error, is it possible
to get ride of it?
===>
Hi ports --
A new version of Dillo was released yesterday. Here's the diff to update.
Some changelog notes:
Some HTML5 elements are now supported.
Improved embedding support.
Better downscaling of images.
Background image support.
And a bunch of bug fixes.
Also: rolling in a separate diff from b
All updated. Also, PLIST was wrong. Default path is /etc/dillo, not
/etc, so this fixes that as well.
Still good on amd64 and loongson.
~Brian
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/dillo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.42
On 2013/04/18 14:31, Brian Callahan wrote:
> - echo " $(INSTALL_DATA) $$files '$(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)'"; \
> +- echo " $(INSTALL_DATA) $$files '$(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)'"; \
> - $(INSTALL_DATA) $$files "$(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)" || exit $$?; \
> -+ $(INSTALL_DATA) $$files "$(PR
Hi ports --
The main website hasn't announced it yet, but dillo-3.0.3 has been
released. Patch attached.
Changelog:
* configurable UI colors in dillorc
* automatic hyphenation (see note below)
* a new domainrc mechanism, which provides finer-grained control over
automatic requests for third-p
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08:46PM +0200, Benoit Lecocq wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This diff updates dillo to the latest release 2.1.1.
>> Tested on amd64/sparc64.
>>
>> Comments ? OK ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> benoit
>>
>
>> ? patches/patch-src_Makefile_in
> you forgot to cvs
Hi,
This diff updates dillo to the latest release 2.1.1.
Tested on amd64/sparc64.
Comments ? OK ?
Cheers,
benoit
? patches/patch-src_Makefile_in
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/www/dillo/Makefile,v
retrieving revis
On Thu 2006.07.06 at 18:05 -0700, Jim Uhl wrote:
>
> On 6-Jul-06, at 10:44 AM, Jim Uhl wrote:
>
> >[ New maintainer ahead - you've been warned. ]
>
> So, of course, I forgot the patch itself.
> Here it is (I hope). Sorry about that.
it's been sometime, but it works well so far on my i386
Jim Uhl [2006-07-09, 12:14:50]:
>
> Thanks very much for the report. If
> you haven't tested cookies yet, would you
> mind doing so? All that is required is
> changing ~/.dillo/cookiesrc to read:
>
> DEFAULT ACCEPT
>
> On sparc64, this causes dillo to lock up
> as soon as an attempt is ma
Thanks very much for the report. If
you haven't tested cookies yet, would you
mind doing so? All that is required is
changing ~/.dillo/cookiesrc to read:
DEFAULT ACCEPT
On sparc64, this causes dillo to lock up
as soon as an attempt is made to access a
web page via http. Thanks.
I've been running this on i386 for a couple of days and it seems to
work fairly well...
On 7/6/06, Jim Uhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6-Jul-06, at 10:44 AM, Jim Uhl wrote:
> [ New maintainer ahead - you've been warned. ]
So, of course, I forgot the patch itself.
Here it is (I hope).
Jim Uhl [2006-07-06, 18:05:08]:
>
> On 6-Jul-06, at 10:44 AM, Jim Uhl wrote:
>
> >[ New maintainer ahead - you've been warned. ]
>
> So, of course, I forgot the patch itself.
> Here it is (I hope). Sorry about that.
>
> Jim Uhl
> diff -uNr dillo.orig/CVS/Root dillo/CVS/Root
> --- d
On 6-Jul-06, at 10:44 AM, Jim Uhl wrote:
[ New maintainer ahead - you've been warned. ]
So, of course, I forgot the patch itself.
Here it is (I hope). Sorry about that.
Jim Uhl
dillo-0.8.6.patch
Description: Binary data
[ New maintainer ahead - you've been warned. ]
Hi,
The dillo web browser port was marked broken due to a memory
allocation bug - this has been fixed upstream in 0.8.6. Attached is a
patch that I hope brings the dillo port back. It has been moderately
tested with the 1 July snapshot of -cu
14 matches
Mail list logo
