Re: gnustep

2005-11-13 Thread Julian Leyh
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:17:48 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:27:27 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And a port was developed in 2004: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-portsm=110519671300293w=2 I know. And the port is

Re: the sorry state of japanese software

2005-11-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu dixit: XIM is useful. Almost all Japanese users should be satisfied with XIM/Kinput2 (if available). kinput2 only WFM in kterm, not in uxterm. I don't use EUC encoding though. //mirabile -- ciruZ Vutral: ohne [...] kram sinds 46 Zeilen. Wozu also ein Tutorial? benz ciruz:

Re: New: milter-bogom

2005-11-13 Thread Juan J.
El sáb, 12-11-2005 a las 19:15 +0100, Peter Strömberg escribió: On 6 Nov 2005 at 18:34, Juan J. wrote: Hello, That's my first port... please be gentle :) Test it and send me comments. You don't need to specify bogofilter-*, it's the default WWW: ${HOMEPAGE} is automatically added

Re: Bug in Mailman package in 3.8 (fwd)

2005-11-13 Thread Tamer Fahmy
On 11/13/05, Tamer Fahmy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, while we are at it! the line for the postix case: CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-mail-gid=nobody is wrong and should be: CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-mail-gid=_mailman i went now through the pita to setup a mailman test installation on 3.8 in

Re: Mozilla Firefox 1.5rc1

2005-11-13 Thread Sigfred Håversen
Peter Strömberg wrote: rc2 require no other change than updating VER Works on i386 with two plugins installed from previous version of Firefox. The rendering of same pages are lagging when scrolling using the right scrollbar (example, http://www.dn.se). In general, Firefox 1.5rc2 seems more

Re: makeg install wont work for ports

2005-11-13 Thread Sebastian Rother
Nikolay: In the ports tree use 'env COPTS=-g make' instead. But again, it We actually prefer DEBUG=-g, that way many ports do not strip their binaries at install time. Nikolay Well thanks for the answers. So I've a change-request (or two): Please enable the possibility to build a software

strcmp vs strncmp question

2005-11-13 Thread patrick ~
I've been looking in some of the ports I have interest in and I have noticed a lot of changes in the patches directory where we are replacing 'strcmp' instances with 'strncmp'. e.g., /* Made up example of course */ - if (!strcmp(buf,n/a)) + if (!strncmp(buf,n/a,3)) Is there a real value

Re: strcmp vs strncmp question

2005-11-13 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:22:42 -0800 (PST), patrick ~ wrote: I've been looking in some of the ports I have interest in and I have noticed a lot of changes in the patches directory where we are replacing 'strcmp' instances with 'strncmp'. e.g., /* Made up example of course */ - if