Re: sparc64 breakage

2005-11-26 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* Jolan Luff [2005-11-25]: net/gaimcannot find silc does anyone know what commit caused gaim not to package correctly? the following diff makes it package again but i'd like to cure the disease, not the symptom. All I can say is, that it packaged ok with the bulk build

Re: teTeX and no_x11

2005-11-26 Thread steven mestdagh
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:56:15PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: hmm, on Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:30:26PM +0100, steven mestdagh said that On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:00:44PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: hi there, i have upgraded my production server to 3.8 release. i have no X

Re: teTeX and no_x11

2005-11-26 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* frantisek holop [2005-11-25]: could this be fixed for 3.8 release? no, only security/reliability issues are fixed in -stable. you can try to backport the fixes from current, if you really need this. isn't this reliability? In principal we only backport security fixes. If sth else

Re: SIP Soft Phone

2005-11-26 Thread Jolan Luff
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:03:45PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote: Nope. If anybody wants to suggest anything that I've missed, or take any of these further, feel free. Roy Morris wrote: Anyone know of a SIP soft phone that works on Obsd? The 3.7 ports don't show any. [EMAIL

Re: update: gtkpod

2005-11-26 Thread Jolan Luff
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:04:53AM +0100, Nikolay Sturm wrote: Attached diff updates gtkpod to 0.94.0, the latest stable release. If someone could test this with an ipod, I'd appreciate it. this doesn't work with my ipod shuffle but the in-tree version does.

Re: glib2/gnome weirdness

2005-11-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Marc Espie dixit: 646ISO-8859-1 646 ASCII to /usr/local/lib/charset.alias should fix things (even though it's slightly incorrect) That looks better to me. //mirabile -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God

UPDATE: archivers/p5-Archive-Zip

2005-11-26 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
Hello, this diff brings archivers/p5-Archive-Zip to the most recent version; 1.16. Tested on i386. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Zip/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 Makefile ---

Re: Request for new port: vifm

2005-11-26 Thread Andreas Bihlmaier
Hello ports@ again, sorry for answering my own mail, but I did some more research: To make vifm compile you just have to install automake 1.7 (I used 1.9) change the links in vifm/ to point to /usr/local/share/automake-1.9/{depcomp,install-sh,missing,mkinstalldirs} The patch I posted before has

Re: UPDATE: archivers/p5-Archive-Zip

2005-11-26 Thread Aleksander Piotrowski
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this diff brings archivers/p5-Archive-Zip to the most recent version; 1.16. Tested on i386. Are you interested in being maintainer of this port? Alek -- - Miro, tak mi przykro. Zawsze litowałam się nad ludźmi, bo mogliście pomyśleć tylko o

Re: UPDATE: archivers/p5-Archive-Zip

2005-11-26 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:57:25 +0100 Aleksander Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this diff brings archivers/p5-Archive-Zip to the most recent version; 1.16. Tested on i386. Are you interested in being maintainer of this port? Yes

Re: teTeX and no_x11

2005-11-26 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Nikolay Sturm said that Now for your problem, you can just pull the -current port's Makefile to your 3.8 machine and it should work. Furthermore it is consensus among porters that installing xbase on a machine is not a problem, so the broken

Re: teTeX and no_x11

2005-11-26 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* frantisek holop [2005-11-26]: call me old fashioned but no_x11 for me means not havint to install any x*.tgz sets. That's the idea. now, of course it's not a huge problem for me to install xbase, it's just that this consensus was never really publicized here before, at least i haven't

Re: teTeX and no_x11

2005-11-26 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:45:06PM +0100, Nikolay Sturm said that maybe it's just me, i was making incorrect assumptions about what no_x11 means. Your assumptions are correct. teTeX_base,no_x11 is broken in that regard and installing xbase is a workaround. and if this is the way

Re: What java port for konqueror?

2005-11-26 Thread steven mestdagh
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: I finally need to activate Java support for Konqueror, but it appears that Java is not by default part of KDE or included in OpenBSD. What port/package(s) do I need for java to work with konqueror on OpenBSD? You are in for some