Semana do Peixe é na Feira Central de Campo Grande - Venha conferir e aproveite as atrações.

2012-03-21 Thread Incriveis Ofertas - Campo Grande
[IMAGE] Não desejo mais receber estes e-mails.

Re: UPDATE: telephony/appkonference

2012-03-21 Thread David Hill
New diff using MAKE_FLAGS and help from sthen@ Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/telephony/appkonference/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -N -u -p Makefile --- Makefile16 Sep 2011 11:41:40 - 1.8 +++ Makefile

Re: UPDATE: telephony/appkonference

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 18:11, David Hill wrote: > This is an update to appkonference. > > Not sure if what I have for the Makefile is the best way to do this... Better to pass these in via MAKE_FLAGS I think. > Tested on amd64. > > Index: Makefile > =

UPDATE: telephony/appkonference

2012-03-21 Thread David Hill
This is an update to appkonference. Not sure if what I have for the Makefile is the best way to do this... Tested on amd64. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/telephony/appkonference/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -N

Re: new: lang/go

2012-03-21 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:09:26AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > The attached is an initial port for the Go programming language > (www.golang.org). A little background - Go is approaching a "Go version1" > release and at that point it will have a stable API. Unfortunately, for > several reasons Go

Another fix for SDL's dynamic loading of X libs

2012-03-21 Thread Brad Smith
*sigh* I had not noticed the second typo in the diff jsg@ sent out to correct the dynamic loading of the X libs and this resulted in SDL of course not using the dynamic loading with the XRender and Xrandr libraries and having downstream projects link to Xrender and Xrandr if using sdl-config. Ind

Re: [NEW] libbluray

2012-03-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:13:18PM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: > with tarballs... I'll look at them within the next 48hours. > > On 2012 Mar 21 (Wed) at 17:12:04 +0100 (+0100), Peter Hessler wrote: > :Brand new releases came out today. > : > :libaacs - 0.3.1 > :libbluray - 0.2.2 > : > :mplayer d

Re: UPDATE: SDL_gfx / SDL_image / SDL_mixer / SDL_net / SDL_ttf

2012-03-21 Thread Brad Smith
On 21/03/12 1:27 PM, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: All builds fine on amd64, you have missing WANTLIB in all diff (Xrandr Xrender). That's something I noticed and needs fixing with the SDL port. Tested for a while with games/warmux seems to be Ok. Cheers. On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:12:27 -0400, Brad Smi

Re: UPDATE: SDL_gfx / SDL_image / SDL_mixer / SDL_net / SDL_ttf

2012-03-21 Thread Gonzalo L. R.
All builds fine on amd64, you have missing WANTLIB in all diff (Xrandr Xrender). Tested for a while with games/warmux seems to be Ok. Cheers. On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:12:27 -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here are updates for most of the other SDL ports.. SDL_gfx 2.0.23 SDL_image 1.2.12 SDL_mixer 1.2

Re: new: lang/go

2012-03-21 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, Joel Sing wrote: > 1. Version numbering - in some ways once Go version 1 is release the > versioning will be somewhat like Python and in the future you may want to > install Go version 1 and Go version 2 on the same machine (different APIs > for > example). However, during the

Re: [NEW] libbluray

2012-03-21 Thread Peter Hessler
with tarballs... On 2012 Mar 21 (Wed) at 17:12:04 +0100 (+0100), Peter Hessler wrote: :Brand new releases came out today. : :libaacs - 0.3.1 :libbluray - 0.2.2 : :mplayer diff is also included. : :I've been using this for a while, and have had several other people make :positive comments on this.

Re: [NEW] libbluray

2012-03-21 Thread Peter Hessler
Brand new releases came out today. libaacs - 0.3.1 libbluray - 0.2.2 mplayer diff is also included. I've been using this for a while, and have had several other people make positive comments on this. OKs? Index: x11/mplayer/Makefile

Re: new: lang/go

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/22 02:09, Joel Sing wrote: > 1. Version numbering - in some ways once Go version 1 is release the > versioning will be somewhat like Python and in the future you may want to > install Go version 1 and Go version 2 on the same machine (different APIs for > example). However, during the

new: lang/go

2012-03-21 Thread Joel Sing
The attached is an initial port for the Go programming language (www.golang.org). A little background - Go is approaching a "Go version1" release and at that point it will have a stable API. Unfortunately, for several reasons Go version 1 will not be officially supported on OpenBSD, however the

Re: NEW: net/sslh

2012-03-21 Thread Björn Ketelaars
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: > You miss the CVS tag in your Makefile, builds fine here on amd64. :) Indeed, I forgot the tag... New version, includes tags and license information. -- Björn Ketelaars sslh.tgz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: NEW: net/sslh

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 06:52, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > Attached is a port of sslh, a ssl/ssh multiplexer. This tool accepts HTTPS, > SSH, OpenVPN, tinc and XMPP connections on the same port. This makes it > possible to connect to any of these servers on port 443 (e.g. from inside a > corporate firewall,

Re: NEW: net/sslh

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 14:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/03/21 06:52, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > > Attached is a port of sslh, a ssl/ssh multiplexer. This tool accepts HTTPS, > > SSH, OpenVPN, tinc and XMPP connections on the same port. This makes it > > possible to connect to any of these servers on

Re: NEW: net/sslh

2012-03-21 Thread Gonzalo L. R.
You miss the CVS tag in your Makefile, builds fine here on amd64. :) On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:52:38 +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: Attached is a port of sslh, a ssl/ssh multiplexer. This tool accepts HTTPS, SSH, OpenVPN, tinc and XMPP connections on the same port. This makes it possible to connect

Re: small diff to netbsd-iscsi-target

2012-03-21 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Claudio Jeker diehard.n-r-g.com> writes: > > This diff changes the VPD page with the serial numbers so that OpenBSD and > Solaris are able to use the netbsd-iscsi-target via multipath. > With this in I'm able to add the iscsi-target to sym(4) and so the > disk is not lost when iscsid is restarte

libzip/pecl-zip [st...@cvs.openbsd.org: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports]

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
note there's also an embedded copy of thise in pecl-zip (and PHP but we don't build that), but they haven't been tracking libzip upstream, they are stuck with a several-year-old version at present. I don't have time to look into that now. - Forwarded message from Stuart Henderson - From

Re: Racket port ready for inclusion in the ports tree

2012-03-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:03:29AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have attached a port of Racket, and it is now tested on both amd64 > > and i386. I think it is ready for inclusion in the ports tree. > > No, not

Re: Racket port ready for inclusion in the ports tree

2012-03-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: > Hello, > > I have attached a port of Racket, and it is now tested on both amd64 > and i386. I think it is ready for inclusion in the ports tree. No, not quite: * COMMENT doesn't take quotes. * I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed

Re: Is MAINTAINER compulsory in Makefile

2012-03-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:29:58AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: > Hello, > I am about to have my Racket port ready tested and I wish it could > get included into the ports tree. Is it compulsory to set the > MAINTAINER variable? I mean, I am reading ports@openbsd.org daily > and I would notice any re

Re: Racket port for testing

2012-03-21 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:01:19AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: > Hello, > > Here comes a port of Racket for testing. > > I have been testing it on a clean install of -current on amd64 and > it is working. > > I have not got it to build on i386 (I get segfault). The question > is, is it possible t