[IMAGE]
Não desejo mais receber estes e-mails.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:08:48AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of the port for Go:
>
> - Version numbering is now 1.0preMMDD as suggested by sthen.
>
> - Fixed PLIST issue so that the port now works correctly on both amd64 and
> i386.
>
> - Fixed issue with USE_
On 22/03/12 5:48 PM, Joe Gidi wrote:
Hello,
I use avidemux on an OpenBSD 5.0 machine to transcode video for playback
on an Android phone; it works great. When I upgraded another machine to a
-current snapshot, I found that faac was disabled for avidemux in August
2011. However, I couldn't find a
Hello,
I use avidemux on an OpenBSD 5.0 machine to transcode video for playback
on an Android phone; it works great. When I upgraded another machine to a
-current snapshot, I found that faac was disabled for avidemux in August
2011. However, I couldn't find an explanation for why this was done. It
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/sox/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -p -r1.49 Makefile
--- Makefile15 Jun 2011 08:29:34 - 1.49
+++ Makefile22 Mar 2012 21:15:25 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMEN
Once more, *with* the forgotten twolame dependency
(thank you Alex).
Jan
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/sox/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.49 Makefile
--- Makefile15 Jun 2011 08:
Attached is an updated version of the port for Go:
- Version numbering is now 1.0preMMDD as suggested by sthen.
- Fixed PLIST issue so that the port now works correctly on both amd64 and
i386.
- Fixed issue with USE_SYSTRACE - for the time being a Go binary needs to be
able to use the sysa
On Thursday 22 March 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/03/22 02:09, Joel Sing wrote:
> > 1. Version numbering - in some ways once Go version 1 is release the
> > versioning will be somewhat like Python and in the future you may want to
> > install Go version 1 and Go version 2 on the same mac
On Thursday 22 March 2012, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, Joel Sing wrote:
> > 1. Version numbering - in some ways once Go version 1 is release the
> > versioning will be somewhat like Python and in the future you may want to
> > install Go version 1 and Go version 2 on the same machine
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:29:03PM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
> disturb with one thing more:
>
> Earlier Antoine wrote this:
>
> * I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
>
> Now Antoine wro
Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
disturb with one thing more:
Earlier Antoine wrote this:
* I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
Now Antoine wrote:
All CONFIGURE_ARGS are missing.
I got confused and I hope somebody can
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
> attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
> it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
LIB_DEP
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:23:53AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got
> worried when I got very fast response on the version still having
> something to be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
>
> I will wait patiently now :)
Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got worried
when I got very fast response on the version still having something to
be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
I will wait patiently now :)
On 03/22/12 10:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
> attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
> it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
I alrea
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> *sigh* I had not noticed the second typo in the diff jsg@ sent out to
> correct the dynamic loading of the X libs and this resulted in SDL
> of course not using the dynamic loading with the XRender and Xrandr
> libraries and having downstream pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
