CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/11/05 23:44:21 Modified files: lang/luajit: Makefile Log message: Remove the lua52 FLAVOR of luajit which build with LUAJIT_ENABLE_LUA52COMPAT defined and wrongly patched luajit to set the abi to

Re: Update: devel/gmp 6.1.1

Christian Weisgerber writes: > This is a long overdue update of devel/gmp to the latest release > (6.1.1). The regression tests are fine on amd64 and i386. Since > this uses assembly optimizations just about everywhere, testing on > other archs would be appreciated,

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/11/05 19:39:54 Modified files: security/dante : Makefile Added files: security/dante/patches: patch-lib_hostcache_c Log message: Stop accessing free'd memory; fixes programs running under

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/11/05 19:32:32 Modified files: devel/elftoolchain: Makefile Added files: devel/elftoolchain/patches: patch-common_elfdefinitions_h Log message: Fix build on alpha. On alpha, defines

Re: Fix devel/elftoolchain on alpha

On 2016 Nov 05 (Sat) at 22:45:48 +0100 (+0100), Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: : : http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//alpha/2016-10-18/devel/elftoolchain.log : :says : : elf.c:34: error: 'EM_ALPHA_EXP' undeclared here (not in a function) : :EM_ALPHA_EXP comes from : : #define ELF_TARG_MACH

meta/haskell-platform -- full or minimal?

Hi, it looks like the concept of a haskell platform has been stripped down do a "minimal" and a "full" flavor: https://www.haskell.org/platform/contents.html I prefer the "minimal" version, because it's less work for me (less constraints on library versions, maybe even less hs-ports). If

Re: remove devel/eclipse ?

Hi, On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:12:46PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > while looking at horrible things in the portstree, i was remembered that > we still had eclipse 3.2.2, which is from february 2007. There were > attempts around 2013 to have eclipse 4.2, but that wasnt finished. > > Are people

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: jer...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 16:33:49 Modified files: lang : Makefile Log message: Hookup mruby

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: jer...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 16:31:28 Log message: Import mruby 1.2.0 mruby is a lightweight, easy to embed version of ruby. Help from juanfra@ and pirofti@ OK juanfra@ Status: Vendor Tag:

Re: Make portbump actually bump even if REVISION is not set

On 11/05 11:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/11/04 14:06, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > Currently if you call portbump and the Makefile does not have REVISION > > set, it does nothing. That definitely was not what I expect, since a > > bump if REVISION is not set involves setting REVISION = 0.

Fix devel/elftoolchain on alpha

http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//alpha/2016-10-18/devel/elftoolchain.log says elf.c:34: error: 'EM_ALPHA_EXP' undeclared here (not in a function) EM_ALPHA_EXP comes from #define ELF_TARG_MACH EM_ALPHA_EXP and elftoolchain on OpenBSD uses ELF_TARG_MACH to find out the

Re: update lang/ghc

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/11/05 14:00, Karel Gardas wrote: >> and if I'm on the same like you, then its clear that I got garbled >> patch from gmail.com... > > gmail is useless for patches, you can fetch it raw from marc.info. >

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: dco...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 15:27:26 Modified files: audio/pianobar : Makefile Added files: audio/pianobar/patches: patch-src_player_c Log message: Turn off ffmpeg's non-fatal error messages. "Skipping 0 bytes

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 11:42:53 Modified files: x11/gnome/builder: Makefile x11/gnome/builder/patches: patch-plugins_terminal_gb-terminal-view_c Log message: Sync

Re: UPDATE: textproc/py-sphinx 1.4.8

ok Alexandr Shadchin, 05 Nov 2016 19:02: > Hi, > > This diff updates py-sphinx to the latest release. > Tested on amd64. > > Comments ? OK ? > > -- > Alexandr Shadchin > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file:

Re: UPDATE: www/py-beautifulsoup4 4.5.1

ok Alexandr Shadchin, 05 Nov 2016 16:22: > Hi, > > This diff updates py-beautifulsoup4 to the latest release. > Tested on amd64. > > Comments ? OK ? > > -- > Alexandr Shadchin > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file:

Re: update lang/ghc

On 2016/11/05 14:00, Karel Gardas wrote: > and if I'm on the same like you, then its clear that I got garbled > patch from gmail.com... gmail is useless for patches, you can fetch it raw from marc.info.

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 10:46:44 Modified files: devel/quirks : Makefile devel/quirks/files: Quirks.pm Log message: Register gnash removal.

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 10:45:43 Modified files: www: Makefile Removed files: www/gnash : Makefile distinfo www/gnash/patches: patch-configure_ac

Re: NEW: sass

frantisek holop, 05 Nov 2016 17:08: > ping? sorry for the noise, was behind a bit. -f -- computers run on smoke. if it leaks out they won't work.

Re: NEW: sass

ping? -- there are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.

Re: UPDATE: archivers/libtar

Committed, thanks. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: update lang/ghc

Thanks to Daniel who provided me with ungarbled version of the patch (instead of gmail.com's garbled version) I've been able to test and found that it fails with: ===> Ignoring patchfile patch-utils_ghc-pkg_Main_hs.orig cd /usr/ports/pobj/ghc-8.0.1/ghc-7.10.3.20161101 &&

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/11/05 09:13:54 Modified files: archivers/libtar: Makefile distinfo Removed files: archivers/libtar/patches: patch-lib_Makefile_in patch-lib_block_c

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 08:50:19 Modified files: x11/gnome/photos: Makefile distinfo Log message: Update to gnome-photos-3.22.2.

UPDATE: textproc/py-sphinx 1.4.8

Hi, This diff updates py-sphinx to the latest release. Tested on amd64. Comments ? OK ? -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.19

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ste...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 07:49:29 Modified files: x11: Makefile Log message: +p5-X11-Protocol-Other

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 07:46:21 Modified files: devel/ruby-yajl: Makefile Log message: Bump: +lib/ruby/gems/2.2/extensions/x86_64-openbsd/2.2/yajl-ruby-1.2.1/

Re: UPDATE: archivers/libtar

On Wed Nov 02, 2016 at 02:15:05AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Rafael Sadowski writes: > > > Hi @ports, > > > > I found this port because the HOMEPAGE is unreachable. The diff fix > > MASTER_SITES and update to last stable release. > > > > Okay? Comments? > >

llvm port fails to build on arm

I ran into a port that used clang and added arm to LLVM_ARCHS. The build errors out after a day or so of building with the below. I've previously built the version under src/gnu without problem. That didn't invoke whatever binutils horrors are implicated in the below. [2695/2736] : &&

Re: update lang/ghc

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote: >> The question is: is my patch command line OK? > > It works fine for me. I took advantage of this situation to have a > reason to test asciinema: > https://asciinema.org/a/1lxc91o7jnqo7btsvwip7f8d4 :) Wonderful! By any

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 06:09:43AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > given that it runs for example on macppc.. ok to import with that line > > zapped. > > zapped > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote: > >

Re: x11/qt5 update-patches

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:10:35 +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > I'm working with x11/qt5 port and I realized outdated patches. As it doesn't change the package, REVISION bumps are not needed. See for instance: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs=147762719016515=2

alpha-1.ports.openbsd.org bulk build report

bulk build on alpha-1.ports.openbsd.org started on Tue Oct 18 14:10:28 MDT 2016 finished at Thu Nov 3 22:23:04 MDT 2016 lasted 17D01h12m done with kern.version=OpenBSD 6.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Tue Oct 18 02:34:50 MDT 2016 built packages:7528 Oct 18:421 Oct 19:327 Oct 20:392 Oct 21:175 Oct

Re: update lang/ghc

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:20:56 +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > and I saved whole your email to /home/karel/src/original_msg.txt from > which I tripped headers and your text to have: You don't really need to do this (but removing them shouldn't create any harm either). > So

Re: New: lang/mruby

> OKs to import? I like the port but I don't think it is ready for import yet. It needs at least a build dependency on bison first ;) --- CCsrc/vm.c -> build/host/src/vm.o CCmrbgems/mruby-bin-mrbc/tools/mrbc/mrbc.c ->

Re: update lang/ghc

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 10:48:11PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: >> Simple patch < your message (after stripping headers) failed on me >> with a lot of rejected hunks and files. This is current CVS of ports. >>

x11/qt5 update-patches

Hi ports@, I'm working with x11/qt5 port and I realized outdated patches. Kind regards, Rafael Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/qt5/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.54 Makefile --- Makefile

databases/openldap23 removal ?

Hi, it's this time of the year were you remove the dying leaves from the trees... is anyone *still* using databases/openldap23 ? 2.3.43 is from 2008 (ie... EOL upstream, i'd say) and the only reason we had it was (from vague recollections) that "we don't have unified buffer cache on OpenBSD, and

Re: Make portbump actually bump even if REVISION is not set

On 2016/11/05 11:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/11/04 14:06, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > Currently if you call portbump and the Makefile does not have REVISION > > set, it does nothing. That definitely was not what I expect, since a > > bump if REVISION is not set involves setting REVISION =

Re: Make portbump actually bump even if REVISION is not set

On 2016/11/04 14:06, Jeremy Evans wrote: > Currently if you call portbump and the Makefile does not have REVISION > set, it does nothing. That definitely was not what I expect, since a > bump if REVISION is not set involves setting REVISION = 0. Other b2k16 > attendees also agree. er, that does

UPDATE: www/py-beautifulsoup4 4.5.1

Hi, This diff updates py-beautifulsoup4 to the latest release. Tested on amd64. Comments ? OK ? -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/py-beautifulsoup4/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: jas...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 05:12:58 Modified files: sysutils/gitolite: Makefile distinfo Log message: update to gitolite-3.6.6

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: d...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/11/05 04:29:38 Modified files: lang/cython: Makefile distinfo lang/cython/pkg: PLIST Log message: Update to cython-0.25.1 bulk by and ok aja@

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 06:09:43 -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > You probably want to look at what juanfra@ already did: > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/sysutils/htop > > hmm -- what's causing the

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ni...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 04:14:44 Modified files: www: Makefile Log message: Remove nginx flavors

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > given that it runs for example on macppc.. ok to import with that line > zapped. zapped On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote: > You probably want to look at what juanfra@ already did: >

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 03:01:20 -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > > > htop is an enhanced version of the venerable top(1). > > > > could a porter please add this? i am more than happy to maintain. > > > > ian > > You probably

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 03:01:20 -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > htop is an enhanced version of the venerable top(1). > > could a porter please add this? i am more than happy to maintain. > > ian You probably want to look at what juanfra@ already did:

Re: new: sysutils/htop

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 03:01:20AM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote: > htop is an enhanced version of the venerable top(1). > > could a porter please add this? i am more than happy to maintain. works fine, and i see absolutely no reason for the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS line, given that it runs for example on

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: ste...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/11/05 03:04:05 Log message: import X11::Protocol::Other, some extensions to X11::Protocol feedback and ok jca@ Status: Vendor Tag: steven Release Tags: steven-20161105

new: sysutils/htop

htop is an enhanced version of the venerable top(1). could a porter please add this? i am more than happy to maintain. ian htop-2.0.2.tgz Description: application/tar-gz

Re: hedgewars failed in last bulk

On 11/04/16 08:38, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:17:33PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: >> On 11/03/16 18:30, Nigel Taylor wrote: >>> On 11/03/16 08:27, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> >> Just retried and built... >> >> dpb is building >> >> make SUBDIR="games/hedgewars,-main" >> >>