Re: libxml2 - patches for several CVEs

On 02.06.2017 - 12:26:46, Paul Irofti wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:09:48AM +0200, Matthias Pitzl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On the oss-security mailing list where reports about several CVEs concerning > > libxml2. > > These patches fixes CVE-2017-9047, CVE-2017-9048, CVE-2017-9049 and > > CVE-2

UPDATE: audio/mp3blaster 3.2.5 => 3.2.6

Hi ports -- Attached is a minor update to audio/mp3blaster. It contains bugfixes from the last 8 years. Lets us get rid of some patches too. Still plays my music just fine on my laptop. ~Brian Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/port

Re: [NEW] net/google-compute-engine

On 2017/06/05 13:33, Helen Koike wrote: > > > > > > ok, I'll check openntpd > > > > /etc/rc.d/ntpd is for openntpd, which is in the base OS. > > net/ntpd in ports is the ntp.org software and only used for special > > cases on OpenBSD, it's not a good choice for general-purpose ntp here. > > > >

UPDATE: editors/ne 3.0.1 => 3.1.1

Hi ports -- Attached is a trivial update to editors/ne. ~Brian Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/ne/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.6 Makefile --- Makefile25 Aug 2015 13:18:25 - 1.

Re: NEW: geo/py-planet

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 01:04 CEST, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 01:09:22 +0200, "Sebastian Reitenbach" > wrote: > > > Find updated versions attached. > > Anything more I can/should tweak? > > For py-planet: > > --- pkg/PLIST.orig Sat Jun 3 18:50:38 2017

Re: [BACKPORT] Tor Browser 6.5.2 for 6.1-stable

attila writes: > Hi ports@, > > Attached is a patch for the -stable ports tree to bring Tor Browser up > to 6.5.2. I have not been able to test the packages myself so I could > really use some testing. I cooked some packages for testing if anyone > cares: https://bits.haqistan.net/~tdp/amd64/s

Re: [NEW] net/google-compute-engine

Hi Stuart, Thanks for your review. Please, check my comments below. I also attached a new version with most of the suggested changes (and upstream version 2.3.7 instead of 2.3.6), I would appreciate if you could take a look if it is ok now. On 2017-06-02 05:46 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On

Re: PATCH: Fix SSP on amd64 for ports gcc 4.9

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 04:40:17AM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > "As Shmuel reported in > , > on x86-64 small structures in automatic storage are aligned to 16 bytes. > This seems to be because of a mix-up between bits and bytes in the i386 > ta

UPDATE: misc/dvtm

No need to manually include , does that. This was probably done because -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 would cause __BSD_VISIBLE to be undefined which in turn would prevent SIGWINCH from being defined. -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED is needed, otherwise the compiler will warn about impl

Re: New: net/wireless

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:33 PM Josh Grosse wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:52:57PM +0200, Gregor Best wrote: > > So yeah, does it make sense to have in the ports tree? > > As a user of it for the last year, I'd appreciate it. It > was last posted to ports@ for consideration in September. > >

UPDATE: ldns 1.7.0

Here's a slightly overdue update to ldns-utils 1.7.0. I've tested the bits I use, is there anyone using dnssec who wants to test those parts? Index: Makefile.inc === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/ldns/Makefile.inc,v retrieving revision 1