Re: remove py2 flavor from devel/py-test-vcr

2020-09-17 Thread Bjorn Ketelaars
On Thu 17/09/2020 21:31, Pamela Mosiejczuk wrote: > www/py-vcrpy has removed the python 2 flavor, and with the preceding > update to that, we can remove the python 2 flavor on test-vcr. > > OK? One question: > Index: pkg/PLIST > ===

Re: [new] x11/lxterminal - lightweight, vte-based and desktop-independent terminal

2020-09-17 Thread Bjorn Ketelaars
On Fri 18/09/2020 06:21, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > On Thu 17/09/2020 13:56, Shawn Chiou wrote: > > Hi bket@, > > > > Thanks for your review and advice. > > > > All issues fixed with new attached file. > > Port looks good, and runs fine on amd64. I'm OK with this if someone > wants to import it.

Re: [new] x11/lxterminal - lightweight, vte-based and desktop-independent terminal

2020-09-17 Thread Bjorn Ketelaars
On Thu 17/09/2020 13:56, Shawn Chiou wrote: > Hi bket@, > > Thanks for your review and advice. > > All issues fixed with new attached file. Port looks good, and runs fine on amd64. I'm OK with this if someone wants to import it.

Update: www/py-vcrpy 2.1.1->4.1.0

2020-09-17 Thread Pamela Mosiejczuk
Updates vcrpy to 4.1.0, which removes the python2 flavor. There is a breaking change to how aiohttp follows redirects, and cassettes may need to be re-recorded after the update. Passes 267 tests, fails 17. This port is a test dependency for www/tuir and sysutils/py-vmomi, with no change to pass/

remove py2 flavor from devel/py-test-vcr

2020-09-17 Thread Pamela Mosiejczuk
www/py-vcrpy has removed the python 2 flavor, and with the preceding update to that, we can remove the python 2 flavor on test-vcr. OK? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/py-test-vcr/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1

Re: [New] chafa - terminal graphics viewer

2020-09-17 Thread Tracey Emery
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:11:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > from a quick read-through, > > > COMMENT = Character art facsimile generator > > s/Char/char/ > Blew right past that! Sorry. > > DISTNAME = chafa-1.4.1 > > CATEGORIES =graphics > > > > HOMEP

Re: [New] chafa - terminal graphics viewer

2020-09-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
from a quick read-through, > COMMENT = Character art facsimile generator s/Char/char/ > DISTNAME =chafa-1.4.1 > CATEGORIES = graphics > > HOMEPAGE =https://hpjansson.org/chafa/ > > MAINTAINER = Florian Viehweger > > # GPLv3 is this GPLv3

Re: [New] chafa - terminal graphics viewer

2020-09-17 Thread Tracey Emery
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Florian Viehweger wrote: > Hi, > > > > attached is a port of chafa. It supports most popular image formats, > > > including animated GIFs using ImageMagick. It also provides an API > > > for use in other programs. > > > > > > Tested on amd64 and i386. 'ma

Re: [New] chafa - terminal graphics viewer

2020-09-17 Thread Florian Viehweger
Hi, > > attached is a port of chafa. It supports most popular image formats, > > including animated GIFs using ImageMagick. It also provides an API > > for use in other programs. > > > > Tested on amd64 and i386. 'make test' passes, as well as 'portcheck > > -N' > > > > I'm unsure about the extr

Re: luakit patch: use os.remove() instead of spawning rm(1) process

2020-09-17 Thread Stefan Hagen
Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:51:51PM +0200, Stefan Hagen wrote: > > Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > The following diff is a backport of > > > https://github.com/luakit/luakit/commit/4b22c18d5eb5594136091b7b615dc8f9ded0e32f > > > commit in order to avoid using rm(1) process to re

Re: luakit patch: use os.remove() instead of spawning rm(1) process

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:51:51PM +0200, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Sebastien Marie wrote: > > The following diff is a backport of > > https://github.com/luakit/luakit/commit/4b22c18d5eb5594136091b7b615dc8f9ded0e32f > > commit in order to avoid using rm(1) process to remove a file, but use > > os.remov

Re: luakit patch: use os.remove() instead of spawning rm(1) process

2020-09-17 Thread Stefan Hagen
Sebastien Marie wrote: > The following diff is a backport of > https://github.com/luakit/luakit/commit/4b22c18d5eb5594136091b7b615dc8f9ded0e32f > commit in order to avoid using rm(1) process to remove a file, but use > os.remove() lua function. > > It permits to me to remove a spawn call whereas I

Re: xsane under 6.7

2020-09-17 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:04:12PM -0600, Austin Hook wrote: > > The docs kept saying make sure your device has the necessary permissions, > without saying exactly in which sense that was meant. > > Finally, a few weeks ago I got most of my machines upgraded properly to > 6.7, they were mos

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

2020-09-17 Thread Solene Rapenne
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:06:46 +0200 Solene Rapenne : > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 > > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 > > > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

2020-09-17 Thread Guy Godfroy
Works for me. 17 sept. 2020 08:55:27 Solene Rapenne : > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:06:46 +0200 > Solene Rapenne : > >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 >> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: >> >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 >>> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +

Re: [update] netshot version 0.15.2

2020-09-17 Thread Theo Buehler
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:55:43PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > ping. > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:31:41AM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > > Netshot is now at version 0.15.2. Libraries have been upgraded and the > > UI has been refreshed. The changes are listed here: > > > > https://github.com/n

Re: UPDATE mail/mblaze 1.0 from MAINTAINER

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:51:14PM +, Lucas wrote: > Hello ports@, > > 1.0 release of mblaze is out, with a bunch of stuff (taken from > NEWS.md): > > * Caution! Backwards incompatible changes: > * As a message name, `-` now refers to the message on the standard > input, and not the the

luakit patch: use os.remove() instead of spawning rm(1) process

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, The following diff is a backport of https://github.com/luakit/luakit/commit/4b22c18d5eb5594136091b7b615dc8f9ded0e32f commit in order to avoid using rm(1) process to remove a file, but use os.remove() lua function. It permits to me to remove a spawn call whereas I am looking to properly unveil