Ugh, REALLY should have posted sooner. Oh well, my mistake...
On 11/15/2017 09:53 AM, Adam Mokhtari wrote: > I really should have posted this sooner, but actually I have recently > revived an old version of the Fish port (not in the ports tree), and > it's running on my OpenBSD server. The version is 2.7b1 from the GitHub > releases, because version 2.6.0 has a bug in the configure script that > fails on OpenBSD (there's a test relying on undefined threading > behavior, which from GitHub commit history seems to go back to at least > 2.4.0). I was unable to get autotools to work. Eventually, when 2.7.0 is > released, I will update it to pull the stable version from the official > website instead of GitHub. > > It's not really finished yet, e.g. I didn't try running the tests, but I > haven't noticed any crashes or bugs, so maybe it will work for you as > well (my version is 6.2, arch is amd64). > > I've attached the generated package (fish-2.7b1.tgz), as well as a > tarball of the port (fish.tgz, goes in /usr/ports/shells/fish, for > anyone who wants to work on the package itself). > > The old version can be downloaded from > https://www.mail-archive.com/ports@openbsd.org/msg12511/fish-port.tar.gz > > > On 11/15/2017 08:23 AM, Oscar Forner Martinez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> First timer on this mailing list. I have been running OpenBSD for over >> 2 weeks on my machine, but there are still few small things missing >> from my setup. One of the is the Fish Shell. I haven't been able to >> find it in the packages neither in the ports. >> >> I would like to know if there is someone else working on porting it. I >> can compile it from source without a problem in OpenBSD, so I would >> like to bring it to the ports. I am following >> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html and one of the first >> steps is to check ask in this mailing list :D >> >> Best regards, >> >> Oscar >>
