x11/xmenu : looking for new maintainer

Hello, Because I am lot less interested in OpenBSD as I was before (at least as a desktop OS) I am no longer willing to maintain x11/xmenu port. I just received a repology notification that a new version was released. This port is really easy so you shouldn't have much trouble taking care

[update] xmenu 4.5.5

Hello, This diff updates xmenu to 4.5.5. The only functional change is support for mouse scrolling. Changelog [1] No issue on amd64. Thanks. [1] https://github.com/phillbush/xmenu/blob/master/CHANGELOG Index: Makefile === RCS

Re: [NEW] x11/xmenu

Friendly ping. I really wish it could make it to 6.9 release. Le 05/03/2021 à 19:52, Guy Godfroy a écrit : > Even better. > > Le 05/03/2021 à 16:17, Tracey Emery a écrit : >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 08:34:08AM +0100, Guy Godfroy wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>&

Re: [NEW] x11/xmenu

Even better. Le 05/03/2021 à 16:17, Tracey Emery a écrit : On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 08:34:08AM +0100, Guy Godfroy wrote: Hello, Here is the new tarball with requested changes. Guy Le 05/03/2021 à 00:17, Solene Rapenne a écrit : On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:51:30 +0100 Guy Godfroy : Hello, xmenu

Re: [NEW] x11/xmenu

Hello, Here is the new tarball with requested changes. Guy Le 05/03/2021 à 00:17, Solene Rapenne a écrit : > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:51:30 +0100 > Guy Godfroy : > >> Hello, >> >> xmenu is a contextual menu tool for x11. I used pmenu port proposal I >> saw

Re: [NEW] x11/xmenu

I just realized the file I sent is wrongly named. Should be xmenu.tar.gz instead of xmenu.tag.gz. My bad, sorry. Le 04/03/2021 à 21:51, Guy Godfroy a écrit : Hello, xmenu is a contextual menu tool for x11. I used pmenu port proposal I saw today (developped by the same guy), very few changes

[NEW] x11/xmenu

, which explains maybe some oddity in the config.mk that required a patch. Works on my amd64. Guy Godfroy xmenu.tag.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: [UPDATE] x11/polybar 3.5.4

Here is the diff: you'll see that it need i3 only for building. Users can use polybar without i3. Le 01/03/2021 à 09:05, Guy Godfroy a écrit : > You need i3 only if you want to use i3 module. You can just omit it in > your config file if you're not using i3. > > So, for sure I s

Re: [UPDATE] x11/polybar 3.5.4

. Le 27/02/2021 à 13:03, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:41:39AM +0100, Guy Godfroy wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thanks to recent py-sphinx update, here is the diff to update polybar. >> >> On the old version of the port, i3 support was e

Re: [UPDATE] x11/polybar 3.5.4

Friendly ping. I wish that update to be approved before any other commit will break it. Le 24/02/2021 à 10:52, Guy Godfroy a écrit : > Le 23/02/2021 à 13:14, Stuart Henderson a écrit :> Diff doesn't apply > directly against -current. > > Here is the new diff, should work

Re: [UPDATE] x11/polybar 3.5.4

Le 23/02/2021 à 13:14, Stuart Henderson a écrit :> Diff doesn't apply directly against -current. Here is the new diff, should work now. > it's customary to CC the maintainer in case they aren't watching ports@. Done. > This patch needs updating for the new version rather than deleting. You're

Re: [UPDATE] x11/polybar 3.5.4

Hello, Thanks to recent py-sphinx update, here is the diff to update polybar. On the old version of the port, i3 support was explicitly disabled, don't know why. I re-enabled it and it works fine. Works on amd64. OK? Le 17/02/2021 à 11:37, Stuart Henderson a écrit : > Hold off on the update,

Re: [UPDATE] [WIP] x11/polybar 3.5.4

So what do you recommend to do other upgrades that depends on it (for instance polybar) in the meantime? Le 16/02/2021 à 21:36, Stuart Henderson a écrit : > On 2021/02/16 18:47, Guy Godfroy wrote: >> After some research, I found out that maybe sphinx version had >> something to do

Re: [UPDATE] [WIP] x11/polybar 3.5.4

variables and updating checksums won't do) and the amount of ports depending on py-sphinx and potentially breaking with an update must be huge, I am clueless about how even to begin the work. I would appreciate if somebody with more skills would take care of it. Le 16/02/2021 à 16:23, Guy Godfroy

[UPDATE] [WIP] x11/polybar 3.5.4

Hello, I'm not very skilled in ports maintenance. I'm trying to update polybar port from 3.4.3 to 3.5.4 but I can't get over a Sphinx error. I join the diff of what I made to the port. When I try to complile, I have got this error: [1/91] cd /usr/ports/pobj/polybar-3.5.4/build-amd64/doc &&

Re: [UPDATE] x11/i3 4.19.1

Thanks Stuart and Rafael. Le 13/02/2021 à 09:48, Stuart Henderson a écrit : Oh the xxCONFIGURE_ARGS should just be removed, it was from testing. > The dependencies are not needed unless those args are set. With a git > checkout they are needed in order to generate docs but with a > released

Re: [UPDATE] x11/i3 4.19.1

I ended up by almost duplicating i3-mousedrag. So now i3-sensible-* stuff are back in the game. Let me know what you think about it. Le 12/02/2021 à 08:37, Guy Godfroy a écrit : > Thank you Stuart! > > I'll clean it a bit then. It's the first time I submit such a big por

Re: [UPDATE] x11/i3 4.19.1

Thank you Stuart! I'll clean it a bit then. It's the first time I submit such a big port patch. Concerning patch-meson_build, I only translated the previous file (and now deleted) patch-Makefile_in. I don't know the reason i3-sensible_* tools were removed. Do you think we could include them

[UPDATE] x11/i3 4.19.1

intl pthread, as the command make port-lib-depends-check showed they weren't needed anymore apparently. Guy Godfroy ? maildiff Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/i3/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.126 diff -u -p -r1.126

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

Python-axolotl isn't a Gajim dependency on Archlinux for instance. On the window to enable OMEMO plugin (which isn't enabled by default), it is said that it requires python axolotl.

[UPDATE] textproc/scdoc 1.10.1 -> 1.11.1

Hello, This patch updates scdoc from 1.10.1 -> 1.11.1. Is that OK ? Thanks. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/scdoc/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile --- Makefile4 Apr 2020 16:58:26

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Works for me. 17 sept. 2020 08:55:27 Solene Rapenne : > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:06:46 +0200 > Solene Rapenne : > >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 >> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: >> >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 >>> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Hello, Now that the summer break is over for almost everyone, I wish we could approve this package update (and its dependancies). On 14/08/2020 10:16, Guy Godfroy wrote: Works for me, also it solves the bug of the last version. Le 11/08/2020 à 09:06, Solene Rapenne a écrit : On Mon, 10 Aug

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Works for me, also it solves the bug of the last version. Le 11/08/2020 à 09:06, Solene Rapenne a écrit : On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Also current Gajim version on OpenBSD ports seems broken : https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10218 Le 10/08/2020 à 09:41, 3un0s a écrit : On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: Hi, This

emulators/minivmac

Hello, Sorry for starting a new thread, I couldn't answer to the existing one because I didn't have suscribed yet. I was writing the minivmac port when I saw that somebody did it already. Thanks! but after executing make port-lib-depends-check on your port, it show that it's missing the