On 2019/06/29 22:31, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:41:50 -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk
> wrote:
>
> > Also, do you wish to have the package named recommonmark-0.5.0 or
> > py-recommonmark-0.5.0? Right now it is the former since there isn't a
> > PKGNAME line.
>
> Since Jérémie chose to
On Sat, Jun 29 2019, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:31:52PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:41:50 -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk
>> wrote:
>
>> > Also, do you wish to have the package named recommonmark-0.5.0 or
>> > py-recommonmark-0.5.0? Right now it is the fo
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:41:50 -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk
wrote:
> Also, do you wish to have the package named recommonmark-0.5.0 or
> py-recommonmark-0.5.0? Right now it is the former since there isn't a
> PKGNAME line.
Since Jérémie chose to have a flavor, it needs to be py- prefixed.
Also, setti
"[recommonmark] allows you to write CommonMark inside of Docutils &
Sphinx projects."
It is needed to generate the documentation in llvm-8.0.0.
The patches are there because recent versions of textproc/py-commonmark
rename the module. I'd rather import py-recommonmark as is, with
appropriate co
