Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

2013-10-16 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:59:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Josh Elsasser j...@elsasser.org writes: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

2013-10-12 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Josh Elsasser j...@elsasser.org writes: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

2013-10-11 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. Regress tests results and diff

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

2013-10-11 Thread Josh Elsasser
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: So instead of

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

2013-10-11 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: So instead of

[UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

2013-10-10 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. More tests on amd64 / ok? 1.1.8 i386: === Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure: character.pure.lisp / (CASE-INSENSITIVE-CHAR-COMPARISONS

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

2013-10-10 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. More tests on amd64 / ok? ok krw@ Ken 1.1.8 i386: ===

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

2013-10-10 Thread Josh Elsasser
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. More tests on amd64 / ok? There should be a build-time (and probably runtime)

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

2013-10-10 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. More tests