On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 01:12:34 +0200
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > OK. Or I would also be OK with removing this port.
>
> I suggest we delete it. It was already on life support upstream when
> Landry updated it to the latest version back in
On Tue, Apr 21 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK. Or I would also be OK with removing this port.
I suggest we delete it. It was already on life support upstream when
Landry updated it to the latest version back in 2013. dspam was an
awesome antispam solution, but people have to move on.
OK. Or I would also be OK with removing this port.
On 2020/04/21 22:14, Charlene Wendling wrote:
>
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/mips64/2020-04-02/mail/dspam%2C-main.log
> (same on macppc)
>
> It fails due to some undefined references to libiconv symbols, so i
> changed LDFLAGS for
> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/mips64/2020-04-02/mail/dspam%2C-main.log
(same on macppc)
It fails due to some undefined references to libiconv symbols, so i
changed LDFLAGS for clang archs using ld.bfd, and it builds on macppc
[0].
Safety REVISION bump for mips64 added.
