Congrats to my colleague Alvar Penning for getting the Icinga DB port accepted.
Apropos new ports. Any chance for this little one to make it into -current?
On 02.04.23 13:14, Alexander Klimov wrote:
7.3 is approaching. Would be cool if this little one gets included.
On 14.11.22 23:01,
For the record. This tool is not just for flash memory despite its description.
Just tested a fresh OpenBSD box' root-and-only partition:
2 sectors of 1/2T "slightly changed".
(Meanwhile the box doesn't react to my commands.)
TL;DR: This (memory-type/SMART agnostic) tool is invaluable for
7.3 -stable i386 ok.
7.3 -stable amd64 ok.
Tarball:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=166846294830889=2
On 02.04.23 19:06, Omar Polo wrote:
On 2023/04/02 13:14:40 +0200, Alexander Klimov wrote:
7.3 is approaching. Would be cool if this little one gets included.
It won't make in time for
On 2023/04/02 13:14:40 +0200, Alexander Klimov wrote:
> 7.3 is approaching. Would be cool if this little one gets included.
It won't make in time for 7.3 anymore. The port tree was already
locked for the release and re-opened, and we're now happily hacking on
7.3-current. It could make 7.4
7.3 is approaching. Would be cool if this little one gets included.
On 14.11.22 23:01, Alexander Klimov wrote:
On 14.11.22 10:34, Omar Polo wrote:
On 2022/11/13 16:20:18 +0100, Alexander Klimov
wrote:
On 13.11.22 15:06, Omar Polo wrote:
[...]
anyway, with the unveil/pledge == -1 bit
On 14.11.22 10:34, Omar Polo wrote:
On 2022/11/13 16:20:18 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
On 13.11.22 15:06, Omar Polo wrote:
[...]
anyway, with the unveil/pledge == -1 bit fixed the port is ok to me
assuming it works; i haven't run-tested it.
Apropos run-tested! Please could anyone give
On 2022/11/14 11:14:39 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
> On 14.11.22 10:34, Omar Polo wrote:
> > anyway, with the unveil/pledge == -1 bit fixed the port is ok to me
> I've pushed it. (But I don't understand why it's an actual problem. It's
> a convention like execpromises=NULL and no
On 14.11.22 10:34, Omar Polo wrote:
On 2022/11/13 16:20:18 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
On 13.11.22 15:06, Omar Polo wrote:
[...]
one more nitpick regarding how you updated the call to pledge and
unveil;
+ if (unveil(args.dev_path, "r"))
+ err(1, "unveil");
I'd
On 2022/11/13 16:20:18 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
> On 13.11.22 15:06, Omar Polo wrote:
> > [...]
one more nitpick regarding how you updated the call to pledge and
unveil;
+ if (unveil(args.dev_path, "r"))
+ err(1, "unveil");
I'd explicitly check that unveil returns -1
On 13.11.22 15:06, Omar Polo wrote:
On 2022/11/13 13:34:52 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
On 13.11.22 12:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
One minor issue, argp-standalone only provides a static library, so
this should use BUILD_DEPENDS rather than LIB_DEPENDS (essentially
LIB_DEPENDS is
On 2022/11/13 13:34:52 +0100, Alexander Klimov wrote:
>
>
> On 13.11.22 12:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > One minor issue, argp-standalone only provides a static library, so
> > this should use BUILD_DEPENDS rather than LIB_DEPENDS (essentially
> > LIB_DEPENDS is invalid unless there is a
On 13.11.22 12:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
One minor issue, argp-standalone only provides a static library, so
this should use BUILD_DEPENDS rather than LIB_DEPENDS (essentially
LIB_DEPENDS is invalid unless there is a WANTLIB entry to go with it).
I would like guidance from someone who
One minor issue, argp-standalone only provides a static library, so
this should use BUILD_DEPENDS rather than LIB_DEPENDS (essentially
LIB_DEPENDS is invalid unless there is a WANTLIB entry to go with it).
I would like guidance from someone who knows pledge better than me
about the NULL vs "" for
On 18.10.22 11:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2022/10/16 14:51, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
Hello OpenBSD devs!
Hello Michel!
I'd like OpenBSD to have a package of Michel's software "F3".
https://github.com/AltraMayor/f3
Today I checked out the snapshot ports tree, but didn't find F3 even
14 matches
Mail list logo
