On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:37:04PM -0600, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 01:38:22AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > hashlink has been dying for a bit, probably to do with the 1.11 update.
> > Errors were complaining about no definition of char16_t. Based on what I
> > saw used
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 01:38:22AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> hashlink has been dying for a bit, probably to do with the 1.11 update.
>
> Errors were complaining about no definition of char16_t. Based on what I
> saw used for fixes for clang without c++, I changed it to use uint16_t
> for the
hashlink has been dying for a bit, probably to do with the 1.11 update.
Errors were complaining about no definition of char16_t. Based on what I
saw used for fixes for clang without c++, I changed it to use uint16_t
for the uchar typedef. This fixes the build on sparc64 and doesn't break
it on amd
