On 16 Mar 08:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Yes, please try to get a backtrace.
>
> --
> Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
>
> On 16 March 2020 07:00:06 Uwe Werler wrote:
>
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > thanks for the advice!
> >
> > The output is as follows:
> >
> >
Yes, please try to get a backtrace.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 16 March 2020 07:00:06 Uwe Werler wrote:
On 15 Mar 17:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote:
>
> ###
>
>
> gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server /tmp/redis-server.co
On 15 Mar 17:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote:
> >
> > ###
> >
> >
> > gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server /tmp/redis-server.core
> > GNU gdb 6.3
> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General
On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote:
>
> ###
>
>
> gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server /tmp/redis-server.core
> GNU gdb 6.3
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or
On 15 Mar 06:40, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Hi Theo,
> >
> > just "back ported" redis to 6.6 and it works like a charm on amd64 (except
> > sentinel which segfaults - but it did also on 4.0.14).
> >
>
> Thanks. Yes, there should be no major problems backporting this.
>
> Could you share a reprodu
> Hi Theo,
>
> just "back ported" redis to 6.6 and it works like a charm on amd64 (except
> sentinel which segfaults - but it did also on 4.0.14).
>
Thanks. Yes, there should be no major problems backporting this.
Could you share a reproducer for this sentinel segfault so I can look
into it?
On 12 Mar 22:19, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Released earlier today. According to the changelog [1]:
>
> Upgrade urgency HIGH: This release fixes security issues.
>
> HIGH means that there is a critical bug that affects a subset of users.
> I'm unsure which one of the listed bugs that is, though.
>
>
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:53:12 +0100, Theo Buehler
wrote:
> Opinions?
I vote for "move forward" :)
Cheers,
Daniel
> Built and regress tests run successfully on amd64, macppc and sparc64.
> Some further light testing on amd64 with some toy databases.
I have run the regression tests a few more times and it looks like I got
lucky when running the tests on sparc64 the first two times. Running
them results in one
OK kn
Released earlier today. According to the changelog [1]:
Upgrade urgency HIGH: This release fixes security issues.
HIGH means that there is a critical bug that affects a subset of users.
I'm unsure which one of the listed bugs that is, though.
The source diff to 5.0.7 is relatively small and ther
11 matches
Mail list logo