Michael McConville wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:48:53PM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm building my ports with MAKE_JOBS=4, and I noticed that a few of the
> > > ports were failing.
> > >
> > > * devel/boehm-gcfailed sometimes (c
On 2016/03/17 13:07, Marc Espie wrote:
> Also, in the large scheme of things, there are just a few ports that
> realistically benefit from parallel building. And those are often already
> tagged with DPB_PROPERTIES because they help the actual official
> package building.
Note that you can have
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:48:53PM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building my ports with MAKE_JOBS=4, and I noticed that a few of the
> ports were failing.
>
> * devel/boehm-gcfailed sometimes (can't find "libgc.la" towards the
> end of the build).
Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:48:53PM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm building my ports with MAKE_JOBS=4, and I noticed that a few of the
> > ports were failing.
> >
> > * devel/boehm-gcfailed sometimes (can't find "libgc.la" towards the
> >
Hi,
I'm building my ports with MAKE_JOBS=4, and I noticed that a few of the
ports were failing.
* devel/boehm-gcfailed sometimes (can't find "libgc.la" towards the
end of the build).
* lang/ruby/1.8 failed consistently (can't find "miniruby" at
beg
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:48:53PM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda K�h�ri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building my ports with MAKE_JOBS=4, and I noticed that a few of the
> ports were failing.
I should point out the obvious, that these are not "my" ports in any
maintainer sort of way and that these were the p
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> I should have been more clear in my comment.
>
> Seeing ports failing to build is not really enough.
>
> There is still a fairly nasty limitation in our make wrt matching paths
> between targets that don't have the same filename, but a
I should have been more clear in my comment.
Seeing ports failing to build is not really enough.
There is still a fairly nasty limitation in our make wrt matching paths
between targets that don't have the same filename, but are the same in
the filesystem.
This limitation prevents some ports to b
