Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Donald Allen
2009/8/24 Vadim Zhukov > On 24 August 2009 г. 21:06:52 Donald Allen wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Julien Cabillot > wrote: > > > Midori > > > > I'm trying it now. First reactions, after 10 minutes: > > > > - fast (scrolling on the NY Times website is responsive, unlike > > epiphan

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread patrick keshishian
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:12:45PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: >> Donald Allen wrote: >> >> > You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another security >> > hole >> > and do another release (why do people use this again?

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Landry Breuil
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:12:45PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Donald Allen wrote: > > > You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another security > > hole > > and do another release (why do people use this again?)..." > > > > I, too, have begun to wonder why Firefox is so

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Donald Allen
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Julien Cabillot wrote: > Le Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:12:34 -0400, > Donald Allen a écrit : > > You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another > security > > hole > > and do another release (why do people use this again?)..." > > > > I, too, have be

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Donald Allen wrote: > You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another security > hole > and do another release (why do people use this again?)..." > > I, too, have begun to wonder why Firefox is so popular, particularly since > the major version number went to 3. Then I remind m

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Julien Cabillot
Le Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:12:34 -0400, Donald Allen a écrit : > You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another security > hole > and do another release (why do people use this again?)..." > > I, too, have begun to wonder why Firefox is so popular, particularly since > the major ve

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Donald Allen
You wrote: "Every time I've gotten a diff ready they find another security hole and do another release (why do people use this again?)..." I, too, have begun to wonder why Firefox is so popular, particularly since the major version number went to 3. Then I remind myself that the vast majority of t

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Steven Surdock
> -Original Message- > From: Martynas Venckus [mailto:marty...@venck.us] > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:43 AM > To: b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu; ports@openbsd.org; punoseva...@gmail.com; > Steven Surdock > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > ... > > N

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-24 Thread Martynas Venckus
> From owner-ports+m36...@openbsd.org Mon Aug 24 11:04:03 2009 > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:43:32 -0400 > From: Predrag Punosevac > To: ssurd...@engineered-net.com, b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu, ports@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > > William Yodlowsk

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac
William Yodlowsky wrote: > On 23 August 2009 at 16:31, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > > > Does anyone has diff for compiling Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable. > > Currently, I am running 3.0.12 which has multiple vulnerabilities. > > I tried to edit version number in the

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac
"Steven Surdock" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Predrag Punosevac [mailto:punoseva...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:12 PM > > To: Steven Surdock; ports@openbsd.org > > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Steven Surdock
> -Original Message- > From: Predrag Punosevac [mailto:punoseva...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:12 PM > To: Steven Surdock; ports@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > > "Steven Surdock" wrote: > > > >

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac
"Steven Surdock" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: owner-po...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-po...@openbsd.org] On > Behalf Of > > Martynas Venckus > > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 6:53 PM > > To: ports@openbsd.org; punoseva...@gmail.com &g

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Steven Surdock
> -Original Message- > From: owner-po...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-po...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of > Martynas Venckus > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 6:53 PM > To: ports@openbsd.org; punoseva...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > >

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Martynas Venckus
> From punoseva...@gmail.com Mon Aug 24 02:17:20 2009 > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:16:59 -0400 > From: Predrag Punosevac > To: ports@openbsd.org, marty...@venck.us > Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > > Martynas Venckus wrote: > > > > From owner-ports+m3

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Martynas Venckus wrote: > > From owner-ports+m36...@openbsd.org Sun Aug 23 23:34:53 2009 > > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:31:55 -0400 > > From: Predrag Punosevac > > To: ports@openbsd.org > > Subject: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > > > > Does anyone ha

Re: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Martynas Venckus
> From owner-ports+m36...@openbsd.org Sun Aug 23 23:34:53 2009 > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:31:55 -0400 > From: Predrag Punosevac > To: ports@openbsd.org > Subject: Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable > > Does anyone has diff for compiling Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable. > Curren

Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable

2009-08-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Does anyone has diff for compiling Firefox 3.0.13 on 4.5 Stable. Currently, I am running 3.0.12 which has multiple vulnerabilities. I tried to edit version number in the Makefile for 3.0.12 but apparently there was some other changes so the compilation fails after about 30 minutes. Sorry for