2013/11/28 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/11/28 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +,
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
--
zhuk@
Index: clang/clang.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
Oops, better version for GCC 4.8.
--
zhuk@
Index: clang/clang.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
retrieving
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
--
zhuk@
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add
On 2013/11/27 18:28, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only
2013/11/27 Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com:
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it.
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:53:29PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks
14 matches
Mail list logo
