Re: From -static to ${STATIC}

2014-12-27 Thread James Turner
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 01:46:18AM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > The idea is that ports that build static executables should switch > from specifying "-static" to "${STATIC}" (available in bsd.port.mk, > defined in bsd.own.mk), so they can become static PIE executables > on the archs that su

Re: From -static to ${STATIC}

2014-12-27 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Looks like it works fine here.

Re: From -static to ${STATIC}

2014-12-27 Thread Alexey Suslikov
Christian Weisgerber mips.inka.de> writes: > mail/femail > mail/mini_sendmail I have tried mini_sendmail from www chroot in the past. Had no luck. Ended up with femail :)

Re: From -static to ${STATIC}

2014-12-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/12/25 01:46, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > The idea is that ports that build static executables should switch > from specifying "-static" to "${STATIC}" (available in bsd.port.mk, > defined in bsd.own.mk), so they can become static PIE executables > on the archs that support this. > > Ther

From -static to ${STATIC}

2014-12-24 Thread Christian Weisgerber
The idea is that ports that build static executables should switch from specifying "-static" to "${STATIC}" (available in bsd.port.mk, defined in bsd.own.mk), so they can become static PIE executables on the archs that support this. There may be a few things that really need "-static", but the usu